A sample of 407 university students completed the Leathers Personal Credibility Scale on each of the three candidates for President after the final 1992 televised presidential debate. A factor analysis of respondents' perceptions yielded two dimensions of personal credibility, trustworthiness and dynamism. The personal credibility dimensions were remarkably similar for each of the three candidates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaileyK. D. (1987) Methods of social research. (3rd ed.) New York: Free Press.
2.
BarberJ. D. (1992) The presidential character. (4th ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
LeathersD. G. (1992) Successful nonverbal communications: principles and applications. New York: Macmillan.
4.
McCroskeyJ. C. (1966) Scales for the measurement of ethos. Speech Monographs, 33, 65–72.
5.
McCroskeyJ. C.JensonT. A. (1975) Image of mass media news sources. Journal of Broadcasting, 19(2), 169–180.
6.
NorusisM. J. (1988) SPSSX advanced statistics guide. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc.
7.
O'KeefeD. J. (1990) Persuasion: theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
PowellF. C.WanzenriedJ. W. (1991) Perceptual changes in source credibility: repeated tests using two candidates during a political campaign. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 1107–1114.
9.
PowellF. C.WanzenriedJ. W. (1992) An empirical test of the Leathers Personal Credibility Scale: panel responses to the Clinton candidacy. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 1255–1261.
10.
RobertsW. R. (Transl.) (1952) The works of Aristotle. Vol. II. Rhetoric. (Great Books of the Western World) Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica.3.
11.
WanzenriedJ. W.PowellF. C.FranksL. J. (1989) Perceptions of political competence and the impact of a televised debate. Psychological Reports, 64, 825–826.
