Two groups of university students reported their frequency of watching the presidential debates of 1992 (245 vs 173) while one group was shown the opening and closing statements made by each candidate in each debate. The 1992 Leathers Personal Credibility Scale was used to measure respondents' perceptions of the three candidates. Analysis of variance using frequency of viewing the debates yielded no significant change in perceptions of the candidates among or between groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CampbellT. T.StanleyJ. C. (1963) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs in research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
2.
KatzE.FeldmanJ. (1962) The debates in the light of research: a survey of surveys. In KrausS. (Ed.), The great debates. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univer. Press. Pp. 173–223.
3.
KrausS. (1988) Televised presidential debates and public policy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
LanoueD.SchrottP. (1989a) The effects of primary season debates on public opinion. Political Behavior, 11, 289–306.
5.
LanoueD.SchrottP. (1989b) Voters reactions to televised presidential debates: measurement of the source and magnitude of opinion change. Political Psychology, 10, 275–285.
6.
LeathersD. G. (1992) Successful nonverbal communications: principles and applications. New York: Macmillan.
7.
McIntoshE. G. (1989a) Clarification of issues during the presidential debates. Psychological Reports, 64, 1124.
8.
McIntoshE. G. (1989b) Perceived bias in the presidential debates. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 462.
9.
O'KeefeD. (1990) Persuasion: theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
PayneJ.GoldenJ.MarlierJ.RatzanS. (1989) Perceptions of 1988 presidential and vice-presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 425–435.
WallV.GoldenJ.JamesH. (1988) Perceptions of the 1984 presidential debates and a select 1988 presidential primary debate. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Fall, 541–563.
