Reply to Fudin's Comments on Hudesman,Page,and Rautianen's Experiment on the Use of Subliminal Psychodynamic Activation to Enhance Mathematics Learning
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 1993
Reply to Fudin's Comments on Hudesman,Page,and Rautianen's Experiment on the Use of Subliminal Psychodynamic Activation to Enhance Mathematics Learning
Fudin in 1993 raises a number of methodological concerns that he believes limit the generalizability of the 1992 results obtained by Hudesman, Page, and Rautianen. We believe that the conclusions presented are appropriate to the procedures and results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CUNY Skills Assessment Test. (1978) New York: City Univer. of New York.
2.
FudinR. (1986) Subliminal psychodynamic activation: Mommy and I are not yet one. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 1159–1179.
3.
FudinR. (1993) Comments on Hudesman, Page, and Rautianen's (1992) Subliminal Psychodynamic Activation experiment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 41–42.
4.
GustafsonR.KällménH. (1991) Subliminal psychodynamic activation: An experiment controlling for major possible confounding influences outlined by Fudin. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 163–171.
5.
HudesmanJ.PageW.RautianenJ. (1992) Use of subliminal stimulation to enhance learning mathematics. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 1219–1224.
