This essay points to some of the limitations of statistics in the field of psychology and elsewhere. These include a tendency for sophisticated calculations and software programs to convey an unwarranted level of validity, a loss of personal identity as individuals are placed in categories, a focus on “central tendency” that may miss matters of true importance, and a devaluation of intuitive intellectual functions and of human uniqueness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W. (1937) Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.
2.
AllportG. W. (1942) The use of personal documents in psychological science. New York: Social Science Research Council.
3.
BakanD. (1956) Clinical psychology and logic. American Psychologist, 11, 655–662.
4.
BakanD. (1966) The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423–437.
5.
BerganJ. R.StoneC. A.FeldJ. K. (1985) Path-referenced assessment of individual differences. In ReynoldsC. R.WillsonV. L. (Eds.), Methodological and statistical advances in the study of individual differences. New York: Plenum. Pp. 425–466.
6.
BollesR. C. (1962) The difference between statistical hypotheses and scientific hypotheses. Psychological Reports, 11, 639–645.
7.
ButschR. L. C. (1946) How to read statistics. Milwaukee, WI: Bruce Publ.
8.
CarverR. P. (1978) The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378–399.
9.
DiamondS. (1959) Information and error. New York: Basic Books.
10.
DinhamS. M. (1976) Exploring statistics. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
11.
DittmerC. G. (1926) Introduction to social statistics. New York: A. W. Shaw.
12.
DreyfusH.DreyfusS. (1986) Mind over machine. New York: Free Press.
13.
EdwardsB. (1979) Drawing on the right side of the brain: A course in enhancing creativity and artistic confidence. Los Angeles, CA: J. P. Tarcher.
14.
GigerenzerG.MurrayD. J. (1987) Cognition as intuitive statistics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
GrumetG. W. (1991) Tyranny of the obsessional character. Psychological Reports, 68, 71–93.
16.
HawkinsD. M. (1985) Outliers. In KotzS.JohnsonN. L. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. Vol. 6. New York: Wiley. Pp. 539–543.
17.
HoosI. R. (1972) Systems analysis in public policy: A critique. Los Angeles, CA: Univer. of California Press.
18.
HubbardR.AllenS. J. (1989) On the number and nature of common factors extracted by the Eigenvalue-One Rule using BMDP vs SPSSX. Psychological Reports, 65, 155–160.
19.
HuffD. (1954) How to lie with statistics. New York: Norton.
20.
LundbergG. A. (1926) Case work and the statistical method. Social Forces, 5, 61–65.
21.
LykkenD. T. (1968) Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151–159.
22.
LymanS. (1991) Comments. In The chip vs the chess master. NOVA television program, Show No. 1803, March 26. Boston: WGBH-TV.
23.
McNemarQ. (1960) At random: Sense and nonsense. American Psychologist, 15, 295–300.
24.
MeehlP. E. (1954) Clinical versus statistical prediction. Minneapolis, MN: Univer. of Minnesota Press.
25.
MeehlP. E. (1990) Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195–244.
26.
MorrisonD. E.HenkelR. E. (1970) Significance tests in behavioral research: Skeptical conclusions and beyond. In MorrisonD. E.HenkelR. E. (Eds.), The significance test controversy—a reader. Chicago, IL: Aldine. Pp. 305–311.
27.
NeaveH. R.WorthingtonP. L. (1988) Distribution-free tests. London: Unwin Hyman.
28.
von NeumannJ. (1947) The mathematician. In HeywoodR. B. (Ed.), The works of the mind. Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press. Pp. 180–196.
29.
PolyaG. (1954) Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Vol. II. Patterns of plausible inference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer. Press.
30.
RauzinoV. (1982) Conversations with an intelligent chaos. Datamation, 28, 122–136. ReynoldsC. R.WillsonV. L. (Eds.) (1985) Methodological and statistical advances in the study of individual differences. New York: Plenum.
31.
RosenthalR.GaitoJ. (1963) The interpretation of levels of significance by psychological researchers. Journal of Psychology, 55, 33–38.
32.
RozeboomW. W. (1960) The fallacy of the null-hypothesis significance test. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416–428.
33.
SackettD. L.GentM. (1979) Controversy in counting and attributing events in clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 301, 1410–1412.
34.
SalsburgD. S. (1985) The religion of statistics is practiced in medical journals. American Statistician, 39, 220–223.
35.
SchlaiferR. (1959) Probability and statistics for business decisions: An introduction to managerial economics under uncertainty. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36.
ShannonC. E. (1950) A chess-playing machine. Scientific American, 182(2), 48–51.
37.
SimonH. (1991) Comments. In The chip vs the chess master. NOVA television program, Show No. 1803, March 26. Boston, MA: WGBH-TV.
38.
SimonH. A. (1978) The size of things. In TanurJ. M. (Ed.), Statistics: A guide to the unknown. Oakland, CA: Holden-Day. Pp 240248.
39.
SnyderC. R.FromkinH. L. (1980) Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.
40.
StevensS. S. (1968) Measurement, statistics, and the schemapiric view. Science, 161, 849–856.
41.
TietjenG. L. (1986) A topical dictionary of statistics. New York: Chapman & Hall.
42.
WeaverW. (1963) Lady Luck: The theory of probability. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
43.
WeitzmanR. A. (1984) Seven treacherous pitfalls of statistics, illustrated. Psychological Reports, 54, 355–363.
44.
WrightC. (1988) On the operational definition of toothache. In CataniaA. C.HarnadS. (Eds.), The selection of behavior, the operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: Comments and consequences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univer. Press. Pp. 213–214.
