For 48 observers, the central circle of Ebbinghaus figures appeared smaller as the separation between it and the contextual circles increased. Lightness of the contours only affected the illusion when the contextual circles were large and located close to the central circle. An explanation incorporating size contrast and attraction between contours was offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrignerW. L. (1980) Effect of perceived size upon perceived brightness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51, 1331–1334.
2.
ClavadetscherJ. E. (1991) Studies for a two process theory for geometric illusions. In AndersonN. H. (Ed.), Contributions to information integration theory. Vol. 1. Cognitive. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 217–257.
3.
ClemR. K.PollackR. H. (1975) Illusion magnitude as a function of visual field exposure. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 450–454.
4.
CorenS.MillerJ. (1974) Size contrast as a function of figural similarity. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 355–357.
5.
GirgusJ. S.CorenS.AgdernM. (1972) The interrelationship between the Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 95, 453–455.
6.
JaegerT. B.PollackR. H. (1977) Effect of contrast level and temporal order on Ebbinghaus circle illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 21, 83–87.
7.
MassaroD. W.AndersonN. H. (1971) Judgmental model of the Ebbinghaus illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 147–151.
8.
RobinsonJ. O. (1972) The psychology of visual illusions. London: Hutchinson.
9.
WeintraubD. J. (1979) Ebbinghaus illusion: Context, contour, and age influence the judged size of a circle amidst circles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 353–364.
10.
WeintraubD. J.SchneckM. K. (1986) Fragments of Delboeuf and Ebbinghaus illusions: Contour/context explorations of misjudged circle size. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 147–158.
