On the surface it seems that various Ericksonian theories of hypnotherapy differ considerably from each other; however, they can all be seen to be similar in three areas, namely, focus on the intrapsychic activities of the individual, focus on linear causality, and focus on objectivity of observation. These three foci are shown to embody certain conceptual and practical limitations. It is suggested that such limitations may be circumvented if Ericksonian techniques are applied from the perspective of attribution of meaning rather than from the point of view of reductionism, linearity, and objectivity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonH.GoolishianH. A. (1988) Human systems as linguistic systems: Preliminary and evolving ideas about the implications for clinical theory. Family Process, 27, 371–393.
2.
AraozD. L. (1985) The new hypnosis. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
3.
BandlerR.GrinderJ. (1975) The structure of magic. Vol. I. Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books.
4.
BarberJ. (1977) Rapid induction analgesia: A clinical report. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 19, 138–147.
5.
BarberT. X.CalverleyD. S. (1964) The definition of the situation as a variable affecting “hypnotic-like” suggestibility. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 20, 438–440.
6.
BatesonG. (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
7.
BowersK. S. (1973) Hypnosis, attribution, and demand characteristics. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 21, 226–238.
8.
ChertokL. (1980) Early theories of hypnosis. In BurrowsG. D.DennersteinL. (Eds.), Handbook of hypnosis and psychosomatic medicine. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland. Pp. 1–11.
9.
ColangeloJ. J. (1987) The new hypnosis: Enriching your therapeutic armamentarium. Australian Journal of Clinical Hypnotherapy and Hypnosis, 8, 65–71.
10.
DellP. F. (1982) Beyond homeostasis: Towards a concept of coherence. Family Process, 21, 21–41.
11.
DolanY. M. (1985) A path with a heart, Ericksonian utilization with resistant and chronic clients. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
12.
EfranJ. S.LukensM. D. (1985) The world according to Humberto Maturana. The Family Therapy Networker, 9(3), 23–28, 72–75.
13.
EfranJ. S.LukensR. J.LukensM. D. (1988) Constructivism: What's in it for you?The Family Therapy Networker, 12(5), 27–35.
14.
EricksonM. H. (1980) An introduction to the study and application of hypnosis for pain control. In RossiE. L. (Ed.), The collected papers of Milton H. Erickson on hypnosis. Vol. IV. New York: Irvington. Pp. 237–245.
15.
EricksonM. H. (1985) Life reframing in hypnosis: The seminars, workshops and lectures of Milton H. Erickson. Vol. II. New York: Irvington.
16.
EricksonM. H.RossiE. L. (1979) Hypnotherapy: An exploratory casebook. New York: Irvington.
17.
EricksonM. H.RossiE. L. (1980) Varieties of double bind. In RossiE. L. (Ed.), The collected papers of Milton H. Erickson on hypnosis. Vol. 1. New York: Irvington. Pp. 412–429.
18.
FeldmanJ. B. (1988) The utilization of cognition in psychotherapy: A comparison of Ericksonian and cognitive therapies. In LanktonS. R.ZeigJ. K. (Eds.), Research, comparisons and medical applications of Ericksonian techniques. (Ericksonian Monographs No. 4) New York: Brunner/Mazel. Pp. 57–73.
19.
FourieD. P. (1988) Hypnosis in dental practice: From awkward add-on to smooth integration. Journal of the Dental Association of South Africa, 43, 141–146.
20.
FourieD. P. (1989) “Indirect” suggestion: Ecosystemic considerations. Paper presented at the First European Congress of Ericksonian Hypnosis and Psychotherapy, Heidelberg, Germany, 20–24 September.
21.
FourieD. P. (1990) Simulation in hypnosis research: The “hidden” role of attribution of meaning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 560–562.
22.
FourieD. P. (1991) The withholding of hypnosis in family therapy. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 2(1), 41–53.
23.
FourieD. P.LifschitzS. (1985) Hypnotic behaviour: Mutual qualification. South African Journal of Psychology, 15, 77–80.
24.
FourieD. P.LifschitzS. (1989) Ecosystemic hypnosis: Ideas and therapeutic application. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 6, 99–107.
25.
GesterP. W. (1990) Symbol, metaphor, vision—a hypno-systemic model for psychosomatic and other diseases. Workshop presented at the Biennial International Conference of the South African Institute for Marital and Family Therapy, Broederstroom, South Africa, 2–4 July.
26.
GilliganS. G. (1987) Therapeutic trances, the cooperation principle in Ericksonian hypnotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
27.
HaleyJ. (1963) Strategies of psychotherapy. New York: Grune & Stratton.
28.
HaleyJ. (1973) Uncommon therapy, the psychiatric techniques of Milton H. Erickson. New York: Norton.
29.
HammondD. C. (1985) An instrument for utilizing client interests and individualizing hypnosis. In LanktonS. R. (Ed.), Elements and dimensions of an Ericksonian approach. (Ericksonian Monographs No. 1) New York: Brunner/Mazel. Pp. 111–126.
30.
HavensR. A. (1985) The wisdom of Milton H. Erickson. New York: Irvington.
HoffmanL. (1990) A constructivist position for family therapy. In KeeneyB. P.NolanB. F.MadsenW. L. (Eds.), The systemic therapist. Vol. I. St. Paul, MN: Systemic Family Press. Pp. 3–31.
33.
ImmelmanA. P. J. (1984) Rapid induction analgesia: An Ericksonian hypnotic procedure in dental practice. Unpublished master's thesis, Univer. of Port Elizabeth.
34.
KeeneyB. P.RossJ. M. (1985) Mind in therapy: Constructing systemic family therapies. New York: Basic Books.
35.
KirmayerL. J. (1988) Word magic and the rhetoric of common sense: Erickson's metaphors for mind. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 26, 157–172.
36.
LanktonC. H. (1985) Elements of an Ericksonian approach. In LanktonS. R. (Ed.), Elements and dimensions of an Ericksonian approach. (Ericksonian Monographs No. 1) New York: Brunner/Mazel. Pp. 61–75.
37.
LanktonS. R. (1985a) Multiple-embedded metaphor and diagnosis. In ZeigJ. K. (Ed.), Ericksonian psychotherapy. Vol. I. New York: Brunner/Mazel. Pp. 171–195.
38.
LanktonS. R. (1985b) A states of consciousness model of Ericksonian hypnosis. In LanktonS. R. (Ed.), Elements and dimensions of an Ericksonian approach. (Ericksonian Monographs No. 1) New York: Brunner/Mazel. Pp. 26–41.
39.
LanktonS. R.LanktonC. H. (1983) The answer within: A clinical framework of Ericksonian hypnotherapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
40.
LanktonS. R.ZeigJ. K. (Eds.) (1989) Extrapolations: Demonstrations of Ericksonian therapy. (Ericksonian Monographs No. 6) New York: Brunner/Mazel.
41.
LearyT. (1957) Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald.
42.
LoosV. E.EpsteinE. S. (1989) Conversational construction of meaning in family therapy: Some evolving thoughts on Kelly's sociality corollary. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology. 2, 149–167.
43.
LoriedoC. (1990) Hypnosis and family therapy. Workshop presented at the Fifth European Congress of Hypnosis in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Konstanz, Germany, 18–24 August.
44.
MatthewsW. J. (1985) A cybernetic model of Ericksonian hypnotherapy: One hand draws the other. In LanktonS. R. (Ed.), Elements and dimensions of an Ericksonian approach. (Ericksonian Monographs No. 1) New York: Brunner/Mazel. Pp. 42–60.
45.
MatthewsW. J. (1989) Possibility therapy. Workshop presented at the First European Congress of Ericksonian Hypnosis and Psychotherapy, Heidelberg, Germany, 20–24 September.
46.
MaturanaH. R. (1975) The organization of the living: A theory of the living organization. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7, 313–332.
47.
O'HanlonB. (1985) A study guide of frameworks of Milton Erickson's hypnosis and therapy. In ZeigJ. K. (Ed.), Ericksonian psychotherapy. Vol. I. New York: Brunner/Mazel. Pp. 33–51.
48.
RadtkeH. L.SpanosN. P. (1981) Was I hypnotized? A social psychological analysis of hypnotic depth reports. Psychiatry, 44, 359–376.
49.
RittermanM. (1983) Using hypnosis in family therapy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
50.
RossiE. L. (1989) Commentary. In LanktonS. R.ZeigJ. K. (Eds.), Extrapolations: Demonstration of Ericksonian therapy. (Ericksonian Monographs No. 6) New York: Brunner/Mazel. Pp. 77–79.
51.
SarbinT. R.CoeW. C. (1972) Hypnosis, a social psychological analysis of influence communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
52.
SchmidtG. (1985) Systemische Familientherapie als zirkuläre Hypnotherapie. Familiendynamik, 3, 241–264.
53.
SchmidtG. (1989) Symptome als indirect-hypnotische Partner in Interaktionssystemen. Workshop presented at the First European Congress of Ericksonian Hypnosis and Psychotherapy, Heidelberg, Germany, 20–24 September.
54.
SchwartzmanJ. (1984) Family theory and the scientific method. Family Process, 23, 223–236.
55.
ScroggsK. A. (1986) Ericksonian approaches within family hypnotherapy. Individual Psychotherapy, 42, 506–520.
56.
SimonR. (1985) Deeper, deeper, deeper … The family's hypnotic pull. The Family Therapy Networker, 9(2), 20–28, 69–71.
57.
SpanosN. P. (1982) A social psychological approach to hypnotic behavior. In WearyG.MirelsH. L. (Eds.), Integrations of clinical and social psychology. New York: Oxford Univer. Press. Pp. 231–271
58.
SpanosN. P.FlynnD. M.GaboraN. J. (1989) Suggested negative hallucinations in hypnotic subjects: When no means yes. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 6, 63–67.
59.
SpanosN. P.FlynnD. M.GwynnM. I. (1988) Contextual demands, negative hallucinations, and hidden observer responding: Three hidden observers observed. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 5, 5–10.
60.
SpanosN. P.GorassiniD. R. (1984) Structure of hypnotic test suggestions and attributions of responding involuntarily. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 688–696.
61.
SternC. R. (1985) There's no theory like no-theory: The Ericksonian approach in perspective. In ZeigJ. K. (Ed.), Ericksonian psychotherapy. Vol. I. New York: Brunner/Mazel. Pp. 77–86.
62.
Van GorpW. G.MeyerR. G.DunbarK. D. (1985) The efficacy of direct versus indirect hypnotic induction techniques on reduction of experimental pain. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 33, 319–328.
63.
Von GlasersfeldE. (1984) An introduction to radical constructivism. In WatzlawickP. (Ed.), The invented reality. New York: Norton. Pp. 17–40.
64.
ZamanskyH. S. (1989) Suggested negative visual hallucinations in hypnotic subjects: When no means yes. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 6, 68–70.
65.
ZamanskyH. S.BartisS. P. (1985) The dissociation of an experience: The hidden observer observed. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 243–248.
66.
ZeigJ. K. (1985) The clinical use of amnesia: Ericksonian methods. In ZeigJ. K. (Ed.), Ericksonian psychotherapy. Vol. I. New York: Brunner/Mazel. Pp. 317–337.
