In an experimental study of the everyday, what-is-this? perceptual encounter, the strategies subjects used to identify a focal object were influenced by the object's physical appearance, the amount of context in which it was displayed, and subjects' familiarity with the object. These factors also affected subjects' confidence in the accuracy of their identifications. The results appear to support the contention that visual processing is a middle-out rather than either a top-down or bottom-up sequence.
BiedermanI. (1987) Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115–147.
3.
BiedermanI.TeitelbaumR. C.MazzanotteR. J. (1983) Scene perception: A failure to find a benefit from prior expectancy or familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 411–429.
4.
KinchlaR. A.WolfeJ. M. (1979) The order of visual processing: “top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out.”Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 225–231.
5.
KleineR. E.IIIKernanJ. B. (1991) Contextual influences on the meanings ascribed to ordinary consumption objects. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 311–324.
6.
RockI. (1986) The description and analysis of object and event perception. In BoffK. R.KaufmannL.ThomasJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of human perception and performance. New York: Wiley. Pp. 33.1–33.71.
7.
SekulerR.BlakeR. (1990) Perception. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
8.
TreismanA. (1986) Properties, parts, and objects. In BoffK. R.KaufmannL.ThomasJ. P. (Eds.), Handbook of human perception and performance. New York: Wiley. Pp. 35.1–35.70.
