The present study was designed to investigate the generality of the work-rest ratio rule by using ratios not previously employed with the pursuit rotor task. In addition, a ‘blocking’ measure and a conventional measure of cognitive performance were used to examine the applicability of the rule to a cognitive task. The results offer partial support for the ratio rule on both tasks studied but also indicate that the ratio rule may be limited to a narrow range of ratios.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmmonsR. B. (1947) Acquisition of motor skill: II. Rotary pursuit performance with continuous practice before and after a single rest. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 393–411.
2.
AmnionsR. B. (1952) Relationship of motivation and method of testing to distribution of practice phenomena in rotary pursuit. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 155–164.
3.
AmmonsR. B.AmmonsC. H.MorganR. L. (1958) Subskills in rotary pursuit as affected by rate and accuracy requirements and by distribution of practice. Journal of General Psychology, 58, 259–279.
4.
BarchA. M. (1959) Replication report: Work and rest as variables in cyclical motor performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 415–416.
5.
BillsA. G. (1931) Blocking: A new principle of mental fatigue. American Journal of Psychology, 43, 230–245.
6.
BroadbentD. E. (1953) Noise, paced performance and vigilance tasks. British Journal of Psychology, 44, 295–303.
7.
BroadbentD. E. (1971) Decision and stress. New York: Academic Press.
8.
ConwellH. R.AmmonsR. B. (1951) Joint effects of cyclical practice and rest in rotary pursuit. Journal of Psychology, 31, 137–146.
9.
HaganS. J.WilkersonH. R.NobleC. E. (1980) Pursuit tracking skill as a joint function of work and rest variables. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 683–697.
10.
KimbleG. A. (1949a) An experimental test of a two-factor theory of inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 15–23.
11.
KimbleG. A. (1949b) A further analysis of variables in cyclical motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 332–337.
12.
KimbleG. A.BilodeauE. A. (1949) Work and rest as variables in cyclical motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 150–157.
13.
KimbleG. A.HorensteinB. R. (1948) Reminiscence in motor learning as a function of length of interpolated rest. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 239–244.
14.
NobleC. E.SalazarO. G.SkelleyC. S.WilkersonH. R. (1979) Work and rest variables in the acquisition of psychomotor tracking skill. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 233–246.
15.
PeplerR. D. (1959) Warmth and lack of sleep: Activity or accuracy reduced. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 52, 446–450.
16.
PlutchikR.PettiR. D. (1964) Rate of learning on a pursuit rotor task at a constant work-rest ratio with varying work and rest periods. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 19, 227–231.
17.
WilkinsonR. T. (1961) Interaction of lack of sleep with knowledge of results, repeated testing and individual differences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 236–271.
18.
WilligL. A.AmmonsR. B. (1951) Effects on rotary pursuit of holding work-rest ratio constant and varying its duration. Motor Skills Research Exchange, 3, 90.
