Many researchers have been using the concept of “typicality” to explain the influence of knowledge structures on processing visual stimuli. In this paper we try to establish a preliminary method for measuring the typicality of natural objects contained in environmental scenes. The results are discussed in the context of research on how objects in scenes are identified. We also suggest that scales of typicality continue to be developed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarsalouL. W. (1983) Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11, 211–227.
2.
BeltranF. S. (1990) Typicality effects when processing objects into environmental scenes. Current Psychology Research and Reviews, 9, 69–74.
3.
BeltranF. S.DuqueY, (1991) Photographs and line-drawing pictures used in connection with processing typical and nontypical objects into scenes. (Manuscript under editorial review)
4.
BiedermanI. (1981) On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In KubovyM.PomerantzJ. R. (Eds.), Perceptual organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 234–242.
5.
BiedermanI.MezzanotteR. J.RabinowitzJ. C. (1982) Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 143–177.
6.
ChastainG.ErsoffJ. (1977) Effect of accumulative directional attention shifts on the comparison and integration of visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 641–652.
7.
ChumbleyJ. I. (1986) The roles of typicality, instance dominance, and category member dominance in verifying category membership. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 257–267.
8.
DarkV. J. (1990) Switching between memory and perception: Moving attention or memory retrieval?Memory & Cognition, 18, 119–127.
9.
DixonP. (1985) The category effect in visual detection and partial report. Perception & Psychophysics, 38, 286–295.
10.
FlowersJ. H.LohrD. J. (1985) How does familiarity affect visual search for letter strings?Perception & Psychophysics, 37, 557–563.
11.
FlowersJ. H.PolanskyM. L.KarlS. (1981) Familiarity, redundancy and the spatial control of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 157–166.
12.
FriedmanA. (1979) Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316–355.
13.
LoftusG. R.MackworthN. H. (1978) Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 565–572.
14.
MaltB. C.SmithE. E. (1982) The role of familiarity in determining typicality. Memory & Cognition, 10, 69–75.
15.
MandlerJ. M.ParkerR. E. (1976) Memory for descriptive and spatial information in complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 38–48.
16.
OstryD.MorayN.MarksG. (1976) Attention, practice, and semantic targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 686–694.
17.
PalmerS. E. (1975) The effects of contextual scenes on the identification of objects. Memory & Cognition, 3, 519–526.
18.
PashlerH. (1984) Evidence against late selection stimulus quality effects in previewed displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 429–448.
19.
PezdekK. (1978) Recognition memory for related pictures. Memory & Cognition, 6, 64–69
20.
PezdekK.WhetstoneT.ReynoldsK.AskariB.DoughertyT. (1989) Memory for real-world scenes: The role of consistency with schema expectation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 587–595.
21.
RockI. (1985) Perception and knowledge. Acta Psychologica, 59, 3–22.
22.
RoschE.SimpsonC.MillerR. C. (1976) Structural bases of typicality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 491–502.
23.
StallerJ. D.LappinJ S, (1981) Visual detection of multiletter patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1258–1272.
24.
TverskyB.HemenwayK, (1983) Categories of environmental scenes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 407–433.
25.
VirziR. A.EgethH. E. (1984) Is meaning implicated in illusory conjunctions?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 562–581.
