Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In 1960 Henry and Rogers reported reaction time (RT) increased with increased response complexity while response alternatives were held constant. The purpose of the present study was to observe the effects of RT and movement time (MT) when subjects attempted to separate initiation of a task from the subsequent movement response, 24 subjects performed a ball-striking movement in response to an auditory stimulus. In the experimental condition the subjects were instructed to complete initiation as quickly as possible and then make a separate subsequent movement to strike a ball. It was concluded that subjects could not completely separate the initiation phase from the movement phase of the task but could significantly reduce the RT by focusing on the initiation portion of the task.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anson

J. G.

(1982) Memory drum theory: Alternative tests and explanations for the complexity effects on simple reaction time. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 228–246.

Anson

J. G.

(1989) Effects of moment of inertia on simple reaction time. Journal of Motor Behavior, 21, 60–71.

Baba

D. M.

Marteniuk

R. G.

(1983) Timing and torque involvement in the organization of rapid forearm flexion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 323–331.

Christina

R. W.

Fischman

M. G.

Vercruyssen

M. J. P.

Anson

J. G.

(1982) Simple reaction time as a function of response complexity: Memory drum theory revisited. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 301–321.

Fischman

M. G.

(1984) Programming time as a function of number of movement parts and changes in movement direction. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16, 405–423.

Glencross

D. J.

(1972) Latency and response complexity. Journal of Motor Behavior, 4, 251–256.

Henry

F. M.

(1980) Use of simple reaction time in motor programming studies: A reply to Klapp, Wyatt, & Lingo. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12, 237–242.

Henry

F. M.

(1981) The evolution of memory drum theory of neuromotor reaction. In Brooks

G. A.

(Ed.), Perspectives on the academic discipline of physical education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Pp. 301–322.

Henry

F. M.

Rogers

J. R.

(1960) Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Research Quarterly, 31, 448–458.

10.

Kerr

(1978) Task factors that influence selection and preparation for voluntary movements. In Stelmach

G. E.

(Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 55–69.

11.

Klapp

S. T.

(1978) Reaction time analysis of programmed control. In Hutton

R. S.

(Ed.), Exercise and sport sciences reviews. Santa Barbara, CA: Journal Publishing Affiliates. Pp. 231–253.

12.

Klapp

S. T.

(1980) The memory drum theory after twenty years: Comments on Henry's note. Journal of Motor Behavior, 12, 169–171.

13.

Klapp

S. T.

Erwin

C. I.

(1976) Relation between programming time and duration of the response being programmed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 591–598.

14.

Klapp

S. T.

Wyatt

E. P.

Lingo

W. M.

(1974) Response programming in simple choice reactions. Journal of Motor Behavior, 6, 263–271.

15.

James

(1890) The principles of psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Holt.

16.

Newell

K. M.

Hoshizaki

L. E. F.

Carlton

M. J.

Halbert

J. A.

(1979) Movement time and velocity as determinants of movement timing and accuracy. Journal of Motor Behavior, 11, 49–58.

17.

Norrie

M. L.

(1967) Practice effects on reaction latency for simple and complex movements. Research Quarterly, 38, 79–85.

18.

Norrie

M. L.

(1974) Effects of movement complexity on choice reaction and movement times. Research Quarterly, 45, 154–161.

19.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1988) Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

20.

Siegel

(1986) Movement duration, fractionated reaction time, and response programming. Research Quarterly For Exercise and Sport, 57, 128–131.

Reduction of Reaction Time Preceding Increased Complexity of Movement

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References