Abstract
62 college students articulated the procedural cognition acquired during successful learning of both original and reversal-shifts of the discrimination-reversal learning task. Articulations formed a four-level hierarchy of “declarative cognizance” (defined as correct articulation of reinforcement contingencies) as follows: Level 1 having no declarative cognizance, Level 2 of perceptually based cognizance, Level 3 of concrete-rule-based cognizance, and Level 4 of abstract-rule-based cognizance. The plausibility of this cognitive hierarchy is enhanced by observations that increasingly higher levels of declarative cognizance are associated with increasingly faster learning. Mon-tare's 1983 and 1988 concepts of primary and secondary signalization are invoked to account for the learning processes underlying these examples of procedural cognition and the hierarchy of declarative cognizance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
