Previous research on source credibility yields five dimensions of credibility which remain stable in repeated tests. This study uses perceptions obtained from a panel of 180 college students to test dimensions of source credibility for two candidates, four times during a political campaign. The results show variation of dimensions and measures of source credibility between the candidates and among the measurement periods during this campaign.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersenK.ClevengerT. (1963) A summary of experimental research in Ethos. Speech Monograph, 30, 59–78.
2.
BaileyK. D. (1987) Methods of social research. New York: Free Press.
3.
BandhutmE. S.DavisM. K. (1972) Scales for the measurement of Ethos: Another attempt. Speech Monographs, 39, 296–301.
4.
BerloD. K.LemertJ. B.MertzR. (1969) Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33, 563–576.
5.
BlalockH. M.Jr. (1982) Conceptualization and measurement in the social sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
6.
BowersJ. W.PhillipsW. A. (1967) A note on the generality of source-credibility scales. Speech Monographs, 32, 185–186.
7.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1963) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
8.
CattellR. B. (1978) The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum.
9.
ChildD. (1990) The essentials of factor analysis. (2nd ed.) London: Cassell Educational Ltd.
10.
CronbachL. J. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–331.
11.
FalcioneR. L. (1974) The factor structure of source credibility scales for immediate superiors in the organizational context. Central States Speech journal, 25, 63–66.
12.
HubbardR.AllenS. J. (1989) On the number and nature of common factors extracted by the eigenvalue-one rule using BMDP vs SPSSx. Psychological Reports, 65, 155–160.
13.
KaiserH. F. (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.
14.
KimJ. O.MuellerC. W. (1978) Introduction to factor analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
15.
MarkhamD. (1968) The dimensions of source credibility of television newscasters. Journal of Communication, 18, 57–64.
16.
McCroskeyJ. C. (1966) Scales for the measurement of Ethos. Communication Monographs, 33, 65–72.
17.
McCroskeyJ. C.JensonT. A. (1975) Image of mass media news sources. Journal of broadcasting, 19, 169–180.
18.
McCroskeyJ. C.YoungT. J. (1979) The use and abuse of factor analysis in communication research. Human Communication Research, 8, 375–382.
19.
McCroskeyJ. C.YoungT. J. (1981) Ethos and credibility: The construction and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal, 32, 24–34.
20.
NieN. H.HullC. H.JenkinsJ. G.SteinbrennerK.BentD. H. (1975) Statistical package for the social sciences. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
O'KeefeD. J. (1990) Persuasion: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
