286 shoppers were greeted by one of 6 student-experimenters while entering a bookstore Half the shoppers were touched, and the other half were not. A light touch on the upper arm increased the subjects' shopping time, their amount of shopping, as well as their over-all evaluation of the store.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CruscoA. H.WetzelC. G. (1984) The Midas touch: The effects of interpersonal touch on restaurant tipping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 512–517.
2.
JonesS. E.YarbroughE. (1985) A naturalistic study of the meaning of touch. Communication Monographs, 52, 19–56.
3.
KleinkeC. L. (1977) Compliance to requests made by touching experimenters in field settings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 218–223.
4.
KleinkeC. L. (1980) Interaction between gaze and legitimacy of request on compliance in a field setting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 3–12.
5.
MajorB. (1981) Gender patterns in touching behavior. In MayoC. (Ed.), Gender and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag. Pp. 15–37.
PattersonM. L.PowellJ. L.LenihanM. G. (1986) Touch, compliance and interpersonal affects. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10, 41–50.
8.
StierD. S.HallJ. A. (1984) Gender differences in touch: An empirical and theoretical review. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 440–459.
9.
WillisF. N.HammH. K. (1980) The value of interpersonal touch in securing compliance. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 49–55.
10.
WycoffE. B.HolleyJ. D. (1990) Effects of flight attendants' touch upon airline passengers' perceptions of the attendant and airline. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 932–935.
