Abstract
Eye movements of 20 male and 20 female obese and nonobese subjects were monitored during two body-size estimation tasks using a computer-based video technology. Analysis indicated no differences in body-size estimation between subjects using the staircase method. All subjects slightly underestimated body size; however, obese subjects were more sensitive than normal-weight subjects in detecting size distortion when a signal-detection task was employed. Eye-movement data indicated subjects looked longest at the chest, followed by waist, head, thighs, and calves/ feet, in both the staircase and the signal-detection methods. Women viewed the waist region longer than men. On a signal-detection task subjects were better at detecting body-size distortion when viewing the body from the back than from front or profile.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
