Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Researchers have repeatedly suggested that several dimensions of cognitive style may be related by a common factor or factors. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationships among six of the more commonly studied and reliably measured dimensions of cognitive style. Those assessed were field independence/field dependence, reflectivity/impulsivity, broad/narrow categorizing, intolerance for ambiguity, cognitive complexity/simplicity, and automatization/restructuring. Seven commonly used measures were administered to 99 youth in Grade 11. Using principal components factor analysis, the six dimensions were reduced to three, accounting for 59.5% of the total variance. These were called deliberation, assimilation, and flexibility. The cognitive style dimensions of reflectivity with field independence loaded together on the factor named deliberation while assimilation included automatization and broad categorizing. Tolerance for ambiguity, field independence, and cognitive complexity comprised the factor named flexibility.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Curry

(1990) A critique of the research on learning styles. Educational Leadership, 48(2), 50–56.

Goldstein

K. M.

Blackman

(1978) Cognitive style: Five approaches and relevant research. New York: Wiley.

Greenwald

E. R.

(1968) Perceptual style in role choices and motivational variables. (Doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Texas at Austin) Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 2727A.

Grush

J. E.

Barras

J. A.

Hynan

D. J.

(1983) A new self-report of impulsivity. (Unpublished report, Northern Illinois Univer.) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 263 168)

Jensen

A. R.

Rohrer

W. D.

Jr. (1966) The Stroop color-word test: A review. Acta Psychologica, 25, 36–93.

Kagen

Kogan

(1970) Individual variation in cognitive processes. In Mussen

P. H.

(Ed.), Carmichael's ‘Manual of child psychology'. (3rd ed.) New York: Wiley. Pp. 1263–1365.

Leitgeb

J. L.

Bolocofsky

D. N.

Obrzut

J. E.

(1986) The relationship of cognitive tempo to psychological differentiation and locus of control. Journal of Psychology, 120, 353–361.

MacDonald

A. P.

Jr. (1970) Revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: Reliability and validity. Psychological Reports, 26, 791–798.

Messer

S. B.

(1976) Reflection-impulsivity: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1026–1052.

10.

Messick

(1976) Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity. In Messick

& Associates (Ed.), Individuality and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Pp. 4–22.

11.

Messick

(1984) The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19, 59–74.

12.

Nie

N. H.

Hull

C. H.

Jenkins

J. G.

Steinbrenner

Bent

D. H.

(1975) Statistical package for the social sciences. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.

13.

Pettigrew

T. F.

(1958) The measurements and correlates of category width as a cognitive variable. Journal of Personality, 26, 532–544.

14.

Royce

J. R.

(1973) The conceptual framework for a multi-factor theory of individuality. In Royce

J. R.

(Ed.), Multivariate analysis and psychological theory. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 305–408.

15.

Sack

S. A.

Rice

C. E.

(1974) Selectivity, resistance to distraction, and shifting as three attentional factors. Psychological Reports, 34, 1003–1012.

16.

Salkind

N. J.

(1978) Development of norms for the Matching Familiar Figures Test. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 8, No. 61. (Ms. No. 1718)

17.

Satterly

D. J.

(1979) Covariation of cognitive styles, intelligence, and achievement. British Journal of Psychology, 49, 179–181.

18.

Shipman

V. C.

(1985) Cognitive styles: Some conceptual, methodological, and applied issues. In Gordon

E. E.

(Ed.), Review of research in education. Vol. 12. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Pp. 229–291.

19.

Tripodi

Bieri

(1963) Cognitive complexity as a function of own and provided constructs. Psychological Reports, 13, 26.

20.

Witkin

H. A.

Moore

C. A.

Goodenough

D. R.

Cox

P. W.

(1977) Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47, 1–64.

21.

Witkin

H. A.

Oltman

P. K.

Raskin

Karp

S. A.

(1971) A manual for the Embedded Figures Tests. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Cognitive Styles: A Factor Analysis of Six Dimensions with Implications for Consolidation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References