Research workers typically use forced-choice instruments to measure subjects' perceptions of social objects such as apparel brands. Advantages and disadvantages of alternative methods to measure apparel brand image are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DavisL. L.LennonS. J. (1989) Social perception: Methods for measuring our perceptions of others. In DamhorstM. L.LittrellM. (Chairs), Sociological and psychological aspects of dress. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Association of College Professors of Textiles and Clothing, Atlanta.
2.
KwonY. (1990) Brand name awareness and image perception of women's daytime apparel. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 743–752.
3.
LennonS. J.DavisL. L. (1989) Categorization in first impressions. Journal of Psychology, 123, 439–446.
4.
McCrackenG. (1988) The long interview. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
ParkB. (1986) A method for studying the development of impressions of real people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 907–917.
6.
RowoldK.SchlickP. (1989) Associational dress as communication: Senior cords. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Summer Institute for Semiotic and Structural Studies, Indianapolis, IN.
