The rate of safety belt use for drivers and front-seat passengers was examined by direct behavioral observation during the warning and enforcement phases of a mandatory use law in North Carolina. A substantial increase was noted in belt use for both groups once enforcement was initiated but has slowly eroded over time. Both drivers and passengers exhibited much higher rates of use when the other front seat occupant was also using a safety belt, suggesting the importance of behavior modeling.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AschS. E. (1951) Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgements. In GuetzkowH. (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and menPittsburg, PA: Carnegie Univer. Press. Pp. 177–190.
2.
BishopY. M.FienbergS. E.HollandP. W. (1975) Discrete multivariate analysis: Theory and practiceCambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
CampbellB. J.StewartJ. R.CampbellF. A. (1987) 1985–1986 experience with belt laws in the United StatesChapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center.
4.
CopeJ. G.GrossnickleW. F.GellerE. S. (1986) An evaluation of three corporate strategies for safety belt use promotion. Accident Analysis and Prevention18, 243–251.
5.
CopeJ. G.MoyS. S.GrossnickleW. F. (1988) The behavioral impact of an advertising campaign to promote safety belt useJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis21, 277–280.
6.
GellerE S (1984) Motivating safety belt use with incentives: A critical review of the past and a look to the future. SAE Technical Paper SeriesWarrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers. (No. 840326).
7.
GellerE. S. (1988) A behavioral science approach to transportation safety. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine64, 632–661.
8.
GellerE. S. (1990) Preventing injuries and deaths from vehicle crashes: Encouraging belts and discouraging booze. In EdwardsJ.TindaleR. S.HeathL.PosavacE. J. (Eds.), Social influence processes and preventionNew York: Plenum. Pp. 244–277.
9.
GellerE. S.KalsherM. J.RuddJ. R.LehmanG. R. (1989) Promoting safety belt use on a university campus: An integration of commitment and incentive strategies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology19, 3–19.
10.
GrusecJ. E.SkubiskiS. L. (1970) Model nurturance, demand characteristics of the modeling experiment, and altruism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology14, 352–359.
11.
Highway Safety Dejections. (1987) Seat belt laws: Enforcement is the key to compliance. Newsletter of the University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center1, 4–6.
12.
CenterlineN.C. (1989) Study shows effects of North Carolina seat belt laws. Newsletter of the Governor's Highway Safety Program1, 14.
13.
PartykaS. C. (1989) Lives saved by seat belts from 1983 through 1987. Journal of Traffic Safety Education36, 24–25.
14.
SAS Institute, Inc. (1985) SAS user's guide: StatisticsCary, NC: Author.
15.
SherifM. (1935) An experimental study of stereotypes. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology29, 371–375.
16.
SleetD. A. (1987) Motor vehicle trauma and safety belt use in the context of public health priorities. The Journal of Trauma27, 695–702.
