Recent work by Grossarth-Maticek and Eysenck has suggested that there are personality traits which in combination can predict cancer in healthy probands with 81% accuracy. Many critics have considered this result “too good to be true” It is shown that earlier studies have given results not very different in accuracy, suggesting that such a criticism is unwarranted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaltruschH.StangelW.WaltzM.Cancer from the behavioral perspective: The Type C pattern. Activas Nervosa Superior1988, 30, 18–20.
2.
EysenckH. J.Personality, cancer and cardiovascular disease: A causal analysis. Personality and Individual Differences1985, 5, 535–557.
3.
EysenckH. J.The respective importance of personality, cigarette smoking and interaction effects for the genesis of cancer and coronary heart disease. Personality and Individual Differences1988, 9, 453–464.
4.
FoxB. H.Current theory of psychogenic effects on cancer incidence and prognosis. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology1983, 1, 17–31.
5.
Grossarth–MaticekREysenckH. J.VetterH.Personality type, smoking habit and their interaction as predictors of cancer and coronary heart disease. Personality and Individual Differences1988, 9, 479–495.
6.
KissenD. M.Relationship between lung cancer, cigarette smoking, inhalation and personality. British Journal of Medical Psychology1964, 37, 203–216.
7.
KissenD. M.EysenckH. J.Personality in male lung cancer patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research1962, 6, 123–137.
8.
MeehlP. E.Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports1990, 66, 195–244.
9.
SchmaleA. H.IkerH.Hopelessness as a predictor of cervical cancer. Social Sciences & Medicine1971, 5, 95–100.
