According to Brainerd, Piaget's stages of cognitive development fall somewhere between the poles of explanation and pure description. It is argued that based on empirical evidence, Pascual-Leone's theory provides explanatory constructs for cognitive development by postulating the antecedent variables of Mental Capacity, Field Factor, and the Mobility-Fixity Dimension.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrainerdC. J. (1978) The stage question in cognitive developmental theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 173–213.
2.
ChapmanM. (1988) Contextuality and directionality of cognitive development. Human Development, 31, 92–106.
3.
CollingsJ. N. (1985) Scientific thinking through the development of formal operations: Training in the cognitive restructuring aspect of field-independence. Research in Science and Technological Education, 3, 145–152
4.
FlavellJ. H. (1978) Developmental stage: Explanans or explanandum?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 187.
5.
FlavellJ. H. (1982) On cognitive development. Child Development, 53, 1–10.
6.
HempelC. G. (1965) Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays. New York: Free Press.
7.
JohnstoneA. H.El-BannaH. (1986) Capacities, demands, and processes—a predictive model for science education. Education in Chemistry, 23, 80–84.
8.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1978) On stage: The importance of being a nonconserver. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 188–190.
9.
KarplusR.PulosS.StageE. (1983) Proportional reasoning of early adolescence. In LeshR.LandauM. (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 45–90.
10.
KuhnD.AmselE.O'LoughlinM. (1988) The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego, Ca: Academic Press.
11.
LawsonA. E. (1976) Formal operations and field independence in a heterogeneous sample. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 881–882.
12.
LawsonA. E. (1983) Predicting science achievement: The role of developmental level, disembedding ability, mental capacity, prior knowledge, and beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 117–129.
13.
LawsonA. E.SnitgenD. (1982) Teaching formal reasoning in a college biology course for pre-service teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 233–248.
14.
LinnM. C. (1978) Influence of cognitive style and training on tasks requiring the separation of variables schema. Child Development, 49, 874–877.
15.
NeimarkE. D. (1978) Improper questions cannot be properly answered. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 195–196.
16.
NiazM. (1987a) Mobility-fixity dimension in Witkin's theory of field-dependence/independence and its implications for problem solving in science. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 755–764.
17.
NiazM. (1987b) Relation between M-space of students and M-demand of different items of general chemistry and its interpretation based upon the neo-Piagetian theory of Pascual-Leone. Journal of Chemical Education, 64, 502–505.
18.
NiazM. (1988a) Manipulation of M-demand of chemistry problems and its effect on student performance: A neo-Piagetian study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 643–657.
19.
NiazM. (1988b) Student performance in water pouring and balance beam tasks: Effect of manipulation of perceptual field factor. Research in Science and Technological Education, 6, 39–50.
20.
NiazM. (1989a) Dimensional analysis: A neo-Piagetian evaluation of M-demand of chemistry problems. Research in Science and Technological Education, 7, 153–170.
21.
NiazM. (1989b) A neo-Piagetian interpretation of the mobility-fixity dimension. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 68, 1315–1319.
22.
NiazM. (1989c) Pascual-Leone's theory of constructive operators as an explanatory construct in cognitive development and science achievement. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23.
NiazM. (1989d) Relation between Pascual-Leone's structural and functional M-space and its effect on problem solving in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 93–99.
24.
NiazM. (1989e) The role of cognitive style and its influence on proportional reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, 221–235.
25.
NiazM. (1990) Correlates of formal operational reasoning: A neo-Piagetian analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, in press.
26.
NiazM.LawsonA. E. (1985) Balancing chemical equations: The role of developmental level and mental capacity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 41–51.
27.
NiazM.De Nun˜ezSaud G. (1990) The relationship of mobility-fixity to creativity, formal reasoning, and intelligence. The Journal of Creative Behavior, in press.
28.
Pascual-LeoneJ. (1970) A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301–345.
29.
Pascual-LeoneJ. (1978) Piaget's two main stage criteria: A selective reply to Brainerd. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 200–201.
30.
Pascual-LeoneJ. (1987) Organismic processes for neo-Piagetian theories: A dialectical causal account of cognitive development. International Journal of Psychology, 22, 531–570.
31.
Pascual-LeoneJ. (1988) An organismic process model of Witkin's field-dependence—independence. In GlobersonT.ZelnikerT. (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development. Norwood, Nj: Ablex.
32.
PiagetJ. (1985) The equilibration of cognitive structures: The central problem of intellectual development. Chicago, Il: Univer. of Chicago Press.
33.
SneiderC. I.KurlichK.PulosS.FriedmanA. (1984) Learning to control variables with model rockets: A neo-Piagetian study of learning in field settings. Science Education, 68, 463–484.
34.
StrawitzB. M. (1984) Cognitive style and the acquisition and transfer of the ability to control variables. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 133–141.
