Upon completion of a 3-yr. research project which assessed the effects of Wisconsin's mandatory testing program for drunk drivers, the evaluation showed that a disproportionate number of repeated offenders who were being rearrested had been assessed initially as social drinkers. While there are several possible causes for this finding, the most probable one seems to be that of under-assessment by the testing instrument.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChafetzE.Comments on the NCA criteria for the diagnosis of alcoholism. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1980, 49, 965–981.
2.
DidenkoO. R.McEachornA. W.BergerR. M.PollachS.Drinking Driver and Traffic Safety Project: Final Report, Vol. 1. National Highway Safety Administration Technical Report, DOT HS-800-694.
3.
GurnackA. M.Use of the NCA-modified assessment with a population of intoxicated drivers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1984, 59, 287–298.
4.
GurnackA. M.Final Report, Racine/Kenosha IPID Assessment Population Study. Office of Highway Safety, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Project No. 308-030-86-00-015-01, March 1986.
5.
HoldenR.The Tennessee DUI probation follow-up demonstration project. In Proceedings of Symposium on Traffic Safety Effectiveness (Impact Evaluation Projects). (5/25–5/27, 1982). Chicago, IL: National Safety Council, 1982.
6.
JacobsenG. R.Detection, assessment, and diagnosis of alcoholism: current techniques. In GalanterM. (Ed.), Recent development in alcoholism. Vol. 1. New York: Plenum, 1983. Pp. 377–413.
7.
KelleherE. J.A diagnostic evaluation of 400 drinking drivers. Journal of Safety Research, 1979, 3, 54.
8.
MeyerR. E.BaborT. F.MirkenP. M.Topologies in alcoholism: an overview. International Journal of the Addictions, 1983, 18, 235–249.
9.
PattisonE. M.The NCA diagnostic criteria: critique, assessment alternatives. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1980, 49, 965–981.
10.
ReisR. E.Jr., The traffic safety impact of an education program for first offense drunk drivers: an interim analysis. In Proceedings of Symposium on Traffic Safety Effectiveness (Impact Evaluation Projects). Chicago, IL: National Safety Council,(5/19–5/21, 1981).
11.
RingerC.KiifnerH.AntonsK.FeverleinW.The NCA criteria for the diagnosis of alcoholism. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1977, 38, 1259–1273.
12.
RohanW. P.Comment on the NCA criteria for the diagnosis of alcoholism: an empirical evaluation study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 1978, 98. 211–217.
13.
SanderI.PalmerS.HomenM.WynkoopR.Drinking characteristics of OWI's screened as problem drinkers. Alcohol Health and Research World, 1975, 1, 633–635.
14.
SeixasF. A.Comments on the NCA criteria for diagnosis of alcoholism. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 1977, 38, 1834–1837.
15.
U.S. Department Of Transportation. Results of National Alcohol Safety Action Projects. Washington, DC: National Highway Safety Administration. (Technical Report No. DOT HS-804-033)
