The response format of the Speech Sounds Perception Test confounds speech perception with irrelevant method variance. To rectify this problem the response format was revised by randomizing the response locations. An empirical comparison of the revised and original forms was undertaken with forensic (n = 59) and psychiatric (n = 67) samples. The empirical results coupled with the logical problem in the original form indicates that a revision is necessary.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BolterJ. F.HutchersonW. L.LongC. J. (1984) Speech Sounds Perception Test: a rational response strategy can invalidate the test results. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 132–133.
2.
BolterJ. F.SpectorJ.ZychK. (1984) A comparative analysis of two forms of the Speech Sounds Perception Test. Paper presented at the National Academy of Neuropsychologists Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
3.
BornsteinR. A.LeasonM. (1984) Item analysis of Halstead's Speech Sounds Perception Test: quantitative and qualitative analysis of errors. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 6, 205–214.
4.
GoldenC. J.OsmonD. C.MosesJ. A.BergR. A. (1981) Interpretation of the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: a casebook approach. New York: Grune & Stratton.
5.
HalsteadW. C. (1947) Brain and intelligence: a quantitative study of the frontal lobes. Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press.
6.
JarvisP. E.BarthJ. T. (1984) Halstead-Reitan test battery: an interpretive guide. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
7.
JensenA. R. (1980) Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press.
8.
JoinerB. L. (1981) Lurking variables: some examples. American Statistician, 35, 227–233.
9.
LordF. M. (1985) Estimating the imputed social cost of errors of measurement. Psychometrika, 50, 57–68.
10.
MartinF. N. (1986) Introduction to audiology. (3rd ed.) Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11.
ReitanR. M.WolfsonD. (1985) The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
12.
RussellE. W.NeuringerC.GoldsteinG. (1970) Assessment of brain damage: a neuropsychological key approach. New York: Wiley.
13.
SchearJ. M.SkenesL. L.LarsonV. D. (1988) Effect of simulated hearing loss on speech sounds perception. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 597–602.
14.
VegaA.ParsonsO. A. (1967) Cross-validation of the Halstead-Reitan tests for brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 619–625.
15.
YeudallL. T.ReddonJ. R.GillD. M.StefanykW. O. (1987) Normative data for the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological tests stratified by age and sex. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 346–367.