Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of the use of the left and right hands on haptic identification of letters which were presented in either a normal (0° rotation), downward (90° clockwise rotation), upside down (180° rotation), or facing upward (270° rotation) position. Each of the 80 right-handed subjects was given five series of randomly ordered presentations of sets of 8 letters of the alphabet. The subjects were asked to feel and then name each letter correctly as quickly but as accurately as possible. Times showed no effect of hand, but significant effects were found for different sets of letters, degree of rotation and a significant decrease in identification time was observed across the five series. Interactions occurred between hand and rotation as well as set and rotation. Errors showed a significant interaction of hand with degree of rotation; the right was superior at 0° but the left was superior at 90°. The results were discussed in terms of hypotheses of hemisphere function, mental rotation, and stimulus familiarity.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(1983) Models of hemispheric specialization. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 73–104.

Corballis

M. C.

(1980) Laterality and myth. American Psychologist, 35, 284–295.

Corballis

M. C.

(1988) Recognition of disoriented shapes. Psychological Review, 95, 115–123.

Corballis

M. C.

McLaren

(1984) Winding one's Ps and Qs: mental rotation and mirror-image discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 318–327.

Corballis

M. C.

Sergent

(1988) Imagery in a commissurotomized patient. Neuropsychologia, 26, 13–26.

Corballis

M. C.

Zbrodoff

N. J.

Shetzer

L. I.

Butler

P. B.

(1978) Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits. Memory and Cognition, 6, 98–107.

Deutsch

Bourbon

W. T.

Papanicolaou

A. C.

Eisenberg

H. M.

(1988) Visuospatial tasks compared via activation of regional cerebral blood flow. Neuropsychologia, 26, 445–452.

Dodds

A. G.

(1978) Hemispheric differences in tactuo-spatial processing. Neuropsychologia, 16, 247–254.

Eley

M. G.

(1982) Identifying rotated letter-like symbols. Memory and Cognition, 10, 25–32.

10.

Fischer

S. C.

Pellegrino

J. W.

(1988) Hemisphere differences for components of mental rotation. Brain and Cognition, 7, 1–15.

11.

Gibson

E. J.

Levin

(1969) The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

12.

Goldberg

Costa

L. D.

(1984) Hemisphere differences in the acquisition and use of descriptive systems. Brain and Language, 14, 144–173.

13.

Hollins

(1986) Haptic mental rotation: more consistent in blind subjects? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 80, 950–952.

14.

Hunt

Edwards

Quest

(1988) Haptic identification of letters using the left or right hand. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 403–406.

15.

Jolicoeur

(1985) The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289–303.

16.

Jolicoeur

Landau

M. J.

(1984) Effects of orientation on the identification of simple visual patterns. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 38, 80–93.

17.

Marmor

G. S.

Zaback

L. A.

(1976) Mental rotation by the blind: does mental rotation depend on visual imagery? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 515–521.

18.

O'Boyle

Van Wyhe-Lawler

Miller

D. A.

(1987) Recognition of letters traced in the right and left palms: evidence for a process-oriented tactile asymmetry. Brain & Cognition, 6, 474–494.

19.

Solso

R. L.

King

J. F.

(1976) Frequency and versatility of letters in the English language. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 8, 283–286.

Haptic Identification of Rotated Letters Using the Left or Right Hand

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References