The possibility that sex differences found in previous research on field dependence may have been due partly to experimenters' expectancy was investigated. Three pairs of naive student-experimenters received different information about expected outcomes for males and females on the Rod and Frame Test and the Embedded Figures Test. There was no evidence of an experimenters' expectancy effect, but there was also no significant difference in the performance of men and women on these two tests of field dependence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AschS. E.WitkinH. A. (1948) Studies in space orientation: I. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 325–337.
2.
CaplinP. J.MacphersonG. M.TobinP. (1985) Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? A multilevel critique with new data. American Psychologist, 40, 786–799.
3.
DreyerA. S.DreyerC. A.NebelkopfE. B. (1971) Portable rod-and-frame test as a measure of cognitive style in kindergarten children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 33, 775–781.
4.
FeingoldA. (1988) Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95–103.
5.
Fogliani-MessinaT MFoglianiA. M.DiNuovoS. (1983) The Embedded Figures Test in old age a psychometric note. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 284–286.
6.
GoodenoughD. R. (1986) History of the field dependence construct. In BertiniM.PizzamiglioL.WapnerS. (Eds.), Field dependence in psychological theory, research, and application: two symposia in memory of Herman A. Witkin. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 5–13.
7.
Intons-PetersonM. J. (1983) Imagery paradigms: how vulnerable are they to experimenters' expectations?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 394–412.
8.
LaVoieA. L. (1984) Embedded figures test. In KeyserD. J.SweetlandR. C. (Eds.), Test critiques: Vol. 1. Kansas City, MO Test Corporation of America. Pp. 259–265.
9.
MahliosM. C.D'AngeloK. (1983) Group Embedded Figures Test: psychometric data on children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 423–426.
10.
WitkinH. A.OltmanP. K.RaskinE.KarpS. A. (1971) A manual for the Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
