In a sample of 48 subjects, there was a significant inverse relation between item size and estimation of numerosity. This result was shown to be consistent with Gestalt theory. According to this approach, the components of good figures appear more numerous, and smaller items produce better figures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BinetA. (1969) The perception of lengths and numbers in some small children. In PollackR. H.BrennerM. J. (Eds.), The experimental psychology of Alfred Binet. New York: Springer. Pp. 79–92.
2.
BirnbaumM. H.VeitC. T. (1973) Judgmental illusion produced by contrast with expectancy. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 149–152.
3.
BrownJ., F. (1931) The visual-perception of velocity. Psychologische Forschung, 14, 199–232.
4.
CourtisR.GinsburgN. (1971) The effect of item size on perceived numerosity. Paper presented at the meetings of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Detroit, Michigan.
5.
CousinsJ. B. (1980) Perceived numerosity and Gestalt principles of perceptual organization. Unpublished M. A. thesis, Lakehead Univer.
6.
FrithC. D.FrithU. (1972) The solitaire illusion: An illusion of numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 409–410.
7.
GinsburgN. (1976) Effect of item arrangement on perceived numerosity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 663–668.
8.
GinsburgN. (1980) The regular-random numerosity illusion: Rectangular patterns. Journal of General Psychology, 103, 211–216.
9.
GinsburgN. (1982) Solitaire illusion: Replication and extension. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 209–210.
10.
IttelsonW. (1951) Size as a cue to distance: Static localization. American Journal of Psychology, 64, 54–67.
11.
KoffkaK. (1935) Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt.
12.
KruegerL. E. (1972) Perceived numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 5–9.
13.
WohlwillJ. (1960) Developmental studies of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 249–288
