The purpose of the present study was to examine the potential of a multivariable approach in predicting dental motor skill performance. Variables measuring cognitive knowledge, motor abilities, educational background, and family demographics were examined. Data were obtained from 33 first-year dental students. Scaling and root planing tests were administered to each student at the beginning and end of a 14-week preclinical periodontal course. Correlations were low and no variable significantly predicted pre- or posttest scaling and root planing performance. Results are discussed in terms of the problems associated with predicting motor performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeckM.TaftT.ZimmerS. (1978) Predicting clinical performance: a two-step approach. Journal of Dental Education, 42, 524–527.
2.
BoydM. A.WoodW.ConryR. (1980) Prediction of preclinical operative dentistry performance in two instructional methods. Journal of Dental Education, 44, 328–331.
3.
BoyleA.SantelliJ. (1986) Assessing psychomotor skills: the role of the Crawford Small Parts Dexterity Test as a screening instrument. Journal of Dental Education, 50, 176–179.
4.
DeubertL.SmithM.DownsS.JenkinsC.BerryD. (1975) The selection of dental students: a study of an assessment of manual ability by practical tests. British Dental Journal, 139, 357–361.
5.
DhuruV. B.RypelT. S.JohnstonW. M. (1978) Criterion-oriented grading system for preclinical operative dentistry laboratory course. Journal of Dental Education, 42, 528–531.
6.
DworkinS. (1970) Dental Aptitude Test as performance predictor over four years of dental school: analysis and interpretations. Journal of Dental Education, 34, 28–38.
7.
FleishmanE. A. (1966) Human abilities and the acquisition of skill. Comments on Professor Jones' paper. In BilodeauE. A. (Ed.), Principles of skill acquisition. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 147–167.
8.
FleishmanE. A. (1974) The structure and measurement of physical fitness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
9.
HenryF. M. (1968) Specificity vs. generality in learning motor skill. In BrownR.KenyonG. (Eds.), Classical studies on physical activity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10.
KrietL. H.McDonaldR. E. (1968) Preprofessional grades and the Dental Aptitude Test as predictors of student performance. Journal of Dental Education, 32, 452–457.
11.
RaybouldT. P.RaggardD.NortonT. (1983) Psychomotor skills and technical ability in dental school, Journal of Dental Education, 47, 594–598.
12.
SchmidtR. A. (1982) Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
13.
SilversinJ.DroletteM. (1977) An analysis of admissions procedures in a dental school, Journal of Dental Education, 41, 143–148.
14.
SmithB. (1979) The value of a perception and controls test in predicting performance in dental students and ancillary personnel. Medical Education, 13, 327–250.
15.
WoodW. (1979) Grade averages and DAT scores as predictors of performance in dental school, Journal of Dental Education, 43, 630.
