Vocal Reaction Times to Tachistoscopically Presented High- and Low-Frequency Verbs: Some Evidence for Selective Minor Hemisphere Linguistic Analysis

Abstract

The current study investigated the capacity of the right hemisphere to process verbs using a paradigm proven reliable for predicting differential, minor hemisphere lexical analysis in the normal, intact brain. Vocal reaction times of normal subjects were measured to unilaterally presented verbs of high and of low frequency. A significant interaction was noted between the stimulus items and visual fields. Post hoc tests showed that vocal reaction times to verbs of high frequency were significantly faster following right visual-field presentations (right hemisphere). No significant differences in vocal reaction time occurred between the two visual fields for the verbs of low frequency. Also, significant differences were observed between the two types of verbs following left visual-field presentation but not the right. These results were interpreted to suggest that right-hemispheric analysis was restricted to the verbs of high frequency in the presence of a dominant left hemisphere.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Annett

A classification of hand preference by association analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 1970, 61, 303–321.

Bashore

Vocal and manual reaction time estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. Psychological Bulletin, 1981, 89, 352–368.

Caplan

Holmes

J. M.

Marshall

J. C.

Word class and hemispheric specialization. Neuropsychologia, 1974, 12, 331–337.

Hines

Independent functioning of the two cerebral hemispheres for recognizing bilaterally presented tachistoscopic visual half-field stimuli. Cortex, 1975, 11, 132–143.

Hines

Recognition of verbs, abstract nouns and concrete nouns from the left and right visual half-fields. Neuropsychologia, 1976, 14, 211–216.

Kinsbourne

Lateral interactions in the brain. In Kinsbourne

Smith

W. L.

(Eds.), Hemispheric disconnection and cerebral function. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1975. Pp. 239–259.

McKeever

W. F.

Huling

M. D.

Lateral dominance in tachistoscopic word recognition performances obtained with simultaneous bilateral input. Neuropsychologia, 1971, 19, 481–492.

Moscovitch

The linquistic and emotional functions of the normal tight hemisphere. In Perecman

(Ed.), Cognitive processing in the right hemisphere. New York: Academic Press, 1983. Pp. 57–82.

Rastatter

M. P.

Dell

C. W.

McGuire

Loren

Vocal reaction times to unilaterally presented concrete and abstract nouns; some evidence for differential right hemisphere semantic processing. Cortex, 1987, 23, 135–142.

10.

Rastatter

M. P.

Lawson-Brill

Reaction times of aging subjects to monaural verbal stimuli: some evidence for a reduction in right-hemisphere linguistic processing capacity. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1987, 30, 261–267.

11.

Thorndike

E. L.

Lorge

The teachers' word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia Univer., 1944.

12.

Zaidel

Disconnection syndrome as a model for laterality effects in the normal brain. In Hellige

J. B.

(Ed.), Cerebral hemisphere asymmetry: method, theory, and application. New York: Praeger, 1983. Pp. 95–151.