The closer the imagery ratings of 53 subjects matched those of the subjects of Paivio, Yuille, and Madigan (1968), the more their responses on an unanticipated recognition test were determined by the imagery values of the words, suggesting that their memory was in part organized in terms of imagery strength. There was no apparent relationship between ratings and scores on the Marks Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DanaherB. G., & ThoresenC. E. (1972) Imagery assessment by self-report and behavioral measures. Behavior Research & Therapy, 10, 131–138.
2.
DenisM. (1982) Imaging while reading text: a study of individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 10, 540–545.
3.
DickelM. J., & SlakS. (1983) Imagery vividness and memory for verbal material. Journal of Mental Imagery, 7, 121–126.
4.
ErnestC. H., & PaivioA. (1969) Imagery ability in paired-associate and incidental learning. Psychonomic Science, 15, 181–182.
5.
HaysW. L. (1963) Statistics for psychologists. New York: NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
6.
MarksD. F. (1973) Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 17–24.
7.
PaivioA.YuilleJ. C., & MadiganS. (1968) Concreteness, imagery and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Monograph Supplement76, No. 1 (Part 2), 1–25.
8.
RehmL. (1973) Relationships among measures of visual imagery. Behavior Research and Therapy, 11, 265–270
9.
SheehanP. (1967) Shortened form of Bens' Questionnaire Upon Mental Imagery. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 386–389.
