64 college students reconstructed two scrambled 26-sentence passages, one based primarily on semantic content and the other on episodic content. Assistance was provided in the form of feedback and three signalling sentences. There were statistically significant main effects favoring the semantic passage for recall and for concordance with the original order. There were no effects for signalling. However, a qualitative analysis of sentence clustering suggested that feedback and signalling were differentially more effective for the semantic passage.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerlinerD. C., & RosenshineB. (1977) The acquisition of knowledge in the classroom. In AndersonR. C.SpiroR. J., & MontagueW. E. (Ed.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 375–404.
2.
BovairS., & KierasD. E. (1981) A guide to propositional analysis for research on technical prose. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona. (Tech. Rep. No. 8)
3.
BransfordJ. D., & FranksJ. J. (1971) The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331–350.
4.
BrazeltonT. P. (1974) Toddlers and parents. New York: Dell.
5.
BrittonB. K., & BlackJ. B. (1985) Understanding expository text: from structure to processes and world knowledge. In BrittonB. K. & BlackJ. B. (Eds.), Understanding expository text. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 1–8.
6.
ClarkH. H. (1973) The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: a critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359.
7.
FischerP. M., & MandlH. (1984) Learner text variables and the control of text comprehension and recall. In MandlH.SteerN. L., & TrabassoT. (Eds.), Learning comprehensibility of text. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 213–254.
8.
FraseL. T. (1969) Paragraph organization of written materials: the influence of conceptual clustering upon level of organization. Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 394–401.
9.
FrederiksenC. H. (1977) Semantic processing units in understanding text. In FreedleR. O. (Ed.), Discourse processes: advances in research and theory. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Pp. 58–87.
10.
GetsieR.LangerP., & GlassG. V. (1985) Meta-analyses of the effects of type and combinations of feedback on children's discrimination learning. Review of Educational Research, 55, 9–22.
11.
HintzmanD. L. (1978) The psychology of learning and memory. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
12.
IrwinJ. W. (1982) Effects of coherence explicitness on college readers' prose comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 275–284.
13.
JustM. A., & CarpenterP. A. (1987) The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
KintschW. (1974) The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
KintschW., & Van DijkT. A. (1978) Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
16.
KintschW., & VipondD. (1979) Reading comprehension and readability in educational practice and psychological theory. In NilssonL. (Ed.), Perspectives on memory research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 33–62.
17.
KulhavyR. W.SchmidR. F., & WalkerC. H. (1977) Temporal organization in prose. Review of Educational Research, 14, 115–123.
18.
LangerP. (1983) Modifications of current feedback strategies: a text synthesis approach. Annual Report of the Air Force Office of Scientific Research Summer Faculty Research Program. St. Cloud, FL: Southwestern Center for Electrical Engineering Education Press.
19.
LangerP.KeenanV., & CullerJ. (1987) Effect of content on feedback in processing discourse. Psychological Reports, 60, 1191–1200.
20.
LangerP.KeenanV., & Medosch-SchonbeckC. (1986) Some possible limitations of feedback in instruction. Psychological Reports, 59, 731–741.
21.
LorchR. F.Jr., & ChenA. H. (1986) Effects of number signals on reading and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 263–270.
22.
MeyerB. J. F. (1985) Prose analyses: purposes, procedures, and problems. In BrittonB. K. & BlackJ. B. (Eds.), Understanding expository text. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 11–64.
23.
MeyerB. J. F., & FreedleR. O. (1984) Effects of discourse type on recall. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 121–143.
24.
RederL. M. (1980) The role of elaboration in the comprehension and retention of prose: a critical review. Review of Educational Research, 50, 5–53.
25.
SchultzC. B., & DiVestaF. J. (1972) Effects of passage organization and note taking on the selection of clustering strategies and on the recall of textual material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 244–252.
26.
ThorndykeP. W. (1977) Cognitive structures in comprehension and memory of narrative discourse. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 77–110.
27.
TulvingE. (1983) Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford Univer. Press.
28.
Van DijkT. A., & KintschW. (1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
29.
WoodwardB., & BernsteinC. (1976) The final days. New York: Simon & Schuster.
