Using alcoholics as subjects, the present study attempted a replication of Kirton's 1978 study in which he demonstrated a relationship between his adaption-innovation theory and Witkin's concept of field dependence/independence. Correlations obtained in the present study paralleled those of Kirton. As a group, alcoholics tended to be field-dependent in orientation. Innovators were less field-dependent than adaptors and “average” individuals. It was suggested that the varied characteristics of alcoholics should be considered when planning therapeutic strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaileyW.HustmeyerF., & KristoffersonA. (1961) Alcoholism, brain damage and perceptual dependence. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 35, 1242–1255.
2.
BlaneH. T. (1968) The personality of the alcoholic: guises of dependency. New York: Harper & Row.
3.
GoldsteinG. (1976) Perceptual and cognitive deficit in alcoholics. In GoldsteinG. & NeuringerC. (Eds.), Emprical studies of alcoholism. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Pp. 115–151.
4.
JacobsonG. R.PisaniV. D., & BerenbaumH. L. (1970) Temporal stability of field dependence among hospitalized alcoholics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 76, 10–12.
5.
KarpS. A.KissinB., & HustmeyerF. E. (1970) Field dependence as a predictor of alcoholic therapy dropouts. Journal of Nervous and Menial Disease, 150, 77–83.
6.
KarpS. A., & KonstadtN. L. (1965) Alcoholism and psychological differentiation: long-range effect of heavy drinking on field dependence. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 140, 412–416.
7.
KirtonM. (1976) Adaptors and innovators: a description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622–629.
8.
KirtonM. (1978) Field dependence and adaption-innovation theories. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 1239–1245.
9.
KirtonM. (1982) Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory, manual. (Res. ed.) Hertfordshire, Eng.: Occupation Research Centre.
10.
KirtonM., & HammondS. (1980) Levels of self-actualization of adaptors and innovators. Psychological Reports, 46, 1321–1322.
11.
McWilliamsJ.BrownC. C., & MinardJ. G. (1975) Alcoholism and psychological differentiation: effect of achievement of sobriety on field dependence. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 36, 387–394.
12.
MendelsonJ. H., & MelloN. K. (1985) Alcohol: use and abuse in America. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
13.
NervianoV. J., & GrossH. W. (1983) Personality types of alcoholics on objective inventories: a review. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 44, 837–851.
14.
WitkinH. A. (1950) Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. Journal of Personality, 19, 1–15.
15.
WitkinH. A.DykR. B.FatersonH. F.GoodenoughF. R., & KarpS. A. (1962) Psychological differentiation. New York: Wiley.
16.
WitkinH. A.KarpS. A., & GoodenoughD. R. (1959) Dependence in alcoholics. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcoholism, 20, 493–504.
17.
WitkinH. A.LewisH. B.HertzmanK.MachoverK.MessnerP. S., & WagnerS. (1954) Personality through perception: an experimental and clinical study. New York: Harper.
18.
WitkinH. A.OltmanP. K.RaskinE., & KarpS. A. (1971) A manual for the Embedded Figures Tests. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
