This study was done to investigate changes in reaction times to the first of two temporally spaced stimuli in a double stimulation paradigm. When a foot response was required to the first stimulus, increasing the complexity of the second stimulus-response pair significantly delayed the time to respond to the first stimulus. McLeod's 1977 model of parallel processing appears to offer the best explanation of the data although certain modifications to this model are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlythK. W. (1963) Ipsilateral confusion in 2-choice and 4-choice responses with the hands and feet. Nature, 199, 132.
2.
FranksI. M.CanilJ. (1985) Does the complexity of S2 have any effect upon R-T1? A controversy in the PRP literature. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 779–786.
3.
GottsdankerR. (1979) A psychological refractory period or an unprepared period?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Performance and Perception, 5, 208–215.
4.
KarlinL.KestenbaumR. (1968) Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 167–178.
5.
KovesdiJ.SlakS. (1982) Simple reaction time as a function of preparation for a subsequent choice reaction time task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 45–47.
6.
McLeodP. (1977) Parallel processing and the psychological refractory period. Acta Psychologica, 41, 381–396.
7.
PashlerH. (1984) Processing stages in overlapping tasks: evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358–377.
8.
SmithM. C. (1969) The effect of varying information on the psychological refractory period. In KosterW. G.(Ed.), Attention and performance II. Amsterdam: North Holland Pp. 220–231.
9.
WelfordA. T. (1980) The single-channel hypothesis. In WelfordA. T.(Ed.), Reaction time. London: Academic Press Pp. 215–252.
