Psychological reactance theory and the criminal justice system make opposing predictions regarding the effects of restriction of freedom on compliant behavior. This paper applies reactance theory to the problem of probation recidivism. Theoretical linkages are discussed in terms of implications for probation policy, and possibilities for empirical research are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrehmJ. W. (1966) A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic press.
2.
BrehmS. S.BrehmJ. W. (1981) Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.
3.
BrocknerJ.ElkindM. (1985) Self-esteem and reactance: Further evidence of attitudinal and motivational consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 346–361.
4.
BrocknerJ.GardnerM.BiermanJ.MahanT.ThomasB.WeissW.WintersL.MitchellA. (1983) The roles of self-esteem and self-consciousness in the Wortman-Brehm model of reactance and learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 199–209.
5.
ClinardM. B. (1978) Cities with little crime: The case of Switzerland. New York: Cambridge Univer. Press.
6.
CurrieE. (1985) Confronting crime: An American challenge. New York: Pantheon Books.
7.
GoodsteinL. (1980) Psychological effects of the predictability of prison release: Implications for the sentencing debate. Criminology, 18, 363–384.
8.
GoodsteinL.MacKenzieD. L.ShotlandR. L. (1984) Personal control and inmate adjustment to prison. Criminology, 22, 343–369.
9.
MurrayC. A.CoxL. A. (1979) Beyond probation: Juvenile corrections and the chronic delinquent. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
StrubeM. J.WernerC. (1984) Psychological reactance and the relinquishment of control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 225–234.
11.
ZimringF. E.HawkinsG. (1973) Deterrence: The legal threat in crime control. Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press.
