Evidence shows statistically reliable individual differences among unimpaired subjects in ability to use visual representation of electromyographic voltages. The visual information was displayed as a cursor in a tracking situation. The cursor was then blanked, with subjects being required to place the now invisible cursor over a target. Test-retest correlational significance is demonstrated. The rationale for using visual guidance in rehabilitating stroke victims suffering from loss in motor feedback receives support.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrudnyJ.KoreinJ.GrynbaumB. B.BelandresP. V.GianutsosJ. G. (1979) Helping hemiparetics to help themselves: Sensory feedback therapy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 241, 814–818.
2.
De WeerdtW.HarrisonM. H. (1986) The efficacy of electromyographic feedback for stroke patients: A critical review of the main literature. Physiotherapy, 72, 108–118.
3.
GianutsosJ. G.EbersteinA. (1987) Computer-augmented feedback displays. In CaplanB. (Ed.), Rehabilitation psychology desk reference. Rockville, MD: Aspen. Pp. 365–380.
4.
GianutsosJ. G.EbersteinA.KrasilovskyG.RagnarssonK. T.Good-GoldJ. (1986) Visually displayed EMG feedback: Single case studies of hemiplegic upper extremity rehabilitation. Central Nervous System Trauma, 3, 63–76.
5.
GlassG. V.StanleyJ. C. (1970) Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
NottermanJ. M.TufanoD. R. (1980) Variables influencing outflow-inflow interpretations of tracking performance: Predictability of target motion, transfer function, and practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 85–88.
7.
NottermanJ. M.TufanoD. R.HrapskyJ. S. (1982) Visual-motor organization: Differences between and within individuals. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 723–750. (Monograph Supplement 2-V54).
8.
NottermanJ. M.WeitzmanD. O. (1981) Organization and learning of visual-motor information during differenct orders of limb movement: Step, velocity, acceleration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 916–927.
9.
PosnerM. I. (1967) Characteristics of visual and kinesthetic memory codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 103–107.
10.
PosnerM. I.NissenM. J.KleinR. M. (1976) Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psychological Review, 83, 157–171.
11.
WoodworthR. S. (1899) The accuracy of voluntary movements. Psychological Review Monograph Supplement, 3, No. 2 (Whole No. 13).
12.
YatesA. J. (1980) Biofeedback and modification of behavior. New York: Plenum.
