In this article, the model of deviational salience [italics added], which explains the relationship between self-perceptions and perceptions in general is extended. Original analysis indicated that when individuals evaluate themselves as deviating negatively from their perception of the norm of a salient environmental stimulus, that stimulus becomes mote meaningful. Reexamination of the original data indicates that this outcome also occurs when an individual's self-perceptions are incongruent with quantifiable objective norms. Furthermore, interaction between the two sufficient antecedent conditions of primary deviational salience, negative self-perceptions and incongruence, produces secondary deviational salience. The major dysfunctional consequences of both primary and secondary classifications have been examined. Those most debilitating involve misattribution based on the salient feature and obsessive concern over the feature. Finally, several rational-emotive approaches aimed at reducing deviational salience along with the maladaptive behavioral symptoms have been proposed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsonL. Y.SeligmanM. E. P.TeasdaleJ. D. (1978) Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 49–74.
2.
AbtL. E.BellakL. (1950) Projective psychology. New York: Knopf.
3.
AllportG. W. (1961) Pattern in growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
4.
American Psychiatric Association. (1980) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (3rd ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
5.
American Psychological Association. (1981) Ethical principles in the conduct of research with human participants. Washington, DC: Author.
6.
AndersonC. A.HorowitzC. M.FrenchR. de S. (1983) Attributional style of lonely and depressed people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 127–136.
7.
AndrewsG. R.DebusR. L. (1978) Persistence and causal perception of failure: modifying cognitive attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 154–166.
8.
AtkinsonJ. W.McClellandD. C. (1948) The projective expression of needs: II. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 643–668.
9.
BanduraA. A.WaltersH. (1967) Social learning theory and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10.
BruchH. (1978) The golden cage: the enigma of anorexia nervosa. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press.
11.
BrunerJ. S.GoodmanC. C. (1947) Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42, 33–44.
12.
CampbellD. T. (1967) Stereotypes and the perception of group differences. American Psychologist, 22, 817–829.
EllisA. (1973) Rational-emotive therapy. In CorsiniR. J. (Ed.), Current psycho-therapies. Itasca, IL: Peacock.
15.
EllisA. (1977) Rational-emotive therapy: research data that supports the clinical and personality hypothesis of RET and other modes of cognitive behavior therapy. The Counseling Psychologist, 7, 2–42.
16.
EllisA.GreigerR. (1977) Handbook of rational-emotive therapy. New York: Springer.
17.
FosterlingF. (1985) Attributional retraining: a review. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 495–512.
18.
GoffmanE. (1963) Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19.
HeiderF. (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
20.
HollandJ. L. (1964) Explorations of a theory of vocational choice: IV. Vocational preferences and their relation to occupational images, daydreams and personality. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 12, 93–98.
21.
HollandJ. L. (1966) The psychology of vocational choice. Waltham, MA: Blais-dell.
22.
KerlingerF. N. (1973) Foundations of behavioral research. (2nd ed.) New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
23.
KleckR. E.StrentaA. (1980) Perceptions of the impact of negatively valued physical characteristics on social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 861–873.
24.
KruskalW. H.TanurJ. M. (1978) The international encyclopedia of statistics. New York: Macmillan.
25.
MorrowJ. (1983) Deviational salience: its application to short stature and relation to the perception of adoelscent males. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York Univer.
26.
MorrowJ. (1984) Deviational salience: application to short stature and relation to perception of adolescent boys. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 623–633.
27.
National Center for Health Statistics. (1979) Physical growth range for for children from two to eighteen. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Health Services.
28.
New York State Data Center. (1980) Characteristics of people and housing. Albany, NY: State Department of Commerce.
29.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977) The halo effect: evidence for the unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 450. 456.
30.
OsipowS. H. (1968) Theories of career development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
31.
RotterJ. B. (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, No. 1 (Whole No. 609).
32.
SeligmanM. E. P. (1975) Helplessness: on depression, development and death. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
33.
TajfelH. (1968) Social and cultural factors in perception. In LindzeyG.AronsonE. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology. (2nd ed.) Vol. 3. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
34.
TaylorS. E.FiskeS. (1978) Salience, attention and attribution: top of the head phenomenon. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. II. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 249–288.
35.
WalterP. J. (1984) A long-term follow-up of adolescent anorexia nervosa. Psychological Reports, 60, 1–10.
36.
WeinerB. (1982) An attributionally based theory of motivation and emotion: focus range, and issues. In FeatherN. T. (Ed.), Expectations and actions: expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 163–204.
