Stroop Interference as a Function of Percentage of Congruent Items

Abstract

Color-word interference in the traditional Stroop paradigm was investigated as a function of the percentages of congruent and incongruent items. Over-all color-naming times decreased with increasing percentages of congruent items. The response time function was significantly deviant from linearity, suggesting the existence of sources of interference other than just response competition. While the pattern of response times was consistent with the notion that effects of selective attention may be enhanced by inhibition of information from the irrelevant dimension of words, data for errors did not support a stronger test of the inhibition concept. Topics discussed include the insensitivity of measurements of error and relatedness to other recent Stroop experiments and theories.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dalrymple-Alford

E. C.

Budayr

(1966) Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color-word test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23, 1211–1214.

Dunbar

Macleod

C. M.

(1984) A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 622–639.

Dyer

F. N.

(1973) The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes. Memory and Cognition, 1, 106–120.

Glaser

M. O.

Glaser

W. R.

(1982) Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 875–894.

Glaser

W. R.

Dolt

M. O.

(1977) A functional model to localize the conflict underlying the Stroop phenomenon. Psychological Research, 39, 287–310.

Klein

G. S.

(1964) Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 576–588.

Logan

G. D.

(1980) Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 523–553.

Logan

G. D.

Zbrodoff

N. J.

(1979) When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Memory and Cognition, 7, 166–174.

Logan

G. D.

Zbrodoff

N. J.

(1982) Constraints on strategy construction in a speeded discrimination task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 502–520.

10.

Logan

G. D.

Zbrodoff

N. J.

Williamson

(1984) Strategies in the color-word Stroop task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 135–138.

11.

Lowe

D. G.

(1979) Strategies, context, and the mechanism of response inhibition. Memory and Cognition, 7, 382–389.

12.

Neill

W. T.

(1977) Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 444–450.

13.

Neill

W. T.

(1978) Decision processes in selective attention: Response priming in the Stroop color-word task. Perception and Psychophysics, 23, 80–84.

14.

Redding

G. M.

Gerjets

D. A.

(1977) Stroop effect: Interference and facilitation with verbal and manual responses. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45, 11–17.

15.

Simon

J. R.

Sudalaimuthu

(1979) Effects of S-R mapping and response modality on performance in a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 176–187.

16.

Stroop

J. R.

(1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.

17.

Triesman

A. M.

(1969) Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychological Review, 76, 282–299.

18.

Zajano

M. J.

Hoyceanyls

E. M.

Ouellette

J. F.

(1981) A confound in the standard control condition of the Stroop experiment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 53, 835–841.