This study examined the relationship of extraversion, neuroticism, psychoticism and locus of control with uniqueness and accuracy ratings on favorable and unfavorable Barnum profiles. Subjects were 87 university students. Pearson correlations showed no significant relationships among these variables for the total sample. A further analysis in which the ratings of each sex were considered separately indicated that only one of 48 correlations was statistically significant. Ratings of accuracy and uniqueness did not differ between favorable and unfavorable profiles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlackmoreS.Divination with Tarot cards: an empirical study. Society for Psychical Research, 1983, 52, 97–101.
2.
CarrierN. A.Need correlates of “gullibility”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 66, 84–86.
3.
DicksonD.KellyI. W.The “Barnum effect” in personality assessment: a review of the literature. Psychological Reports, 57, 367–382.
4.
EysenckH. J.EysenckS. B. G.Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. San Diego, CA: Educational & Industrial Testing Service, 1975.
HalperinK. M.SnyderD. M.ShenkelR. J.Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1976, 61, 85–88.
7.
HymanR.“Cold reading”: how to convince strangers that you know all about them. The Skeptical Inquirer, 1977, 1, 18–37.
8.
HymanR.The psychic reading. In SebeokR. A.RosenthalR. (Eds.), The clever Hans phenomenon. New York: Academy of Sciences, 1981. Pp. 169–181.
9.
JamesW. J.ShepelL. F.A restandardization and factor analytic study of the Liken method of measuring locus of control. Proceedings of the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, Canada, 1973, 81, 19–20.
10.
JohnsonJ. T.CainL. M.FalkeT. L.HaymanJ.PerilloE.The “Barnum effect” revisited: cognitive and motivational factors in the acceptance of personality descriptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985, 49, 1378–1391.
11.
NelsonR. A.The art of cold reading. Calgary, Alberta: Micky Hades International, 1971. (a).
12.
NelsonR. A.A sequel to the art of cold reading. Calgary, Alberta: Micky Hades International, 1971. (b).
13.
OrpenC.JamotteA.The acceptance of generalized personality interpretations. Journal of Social Psychology, 1975, 96, 147–148.
14.
SnyderC. R.LarsenD. K.BloomL. J.Acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receipt of diagnostic feedback supposedly based on psychological, grapbological and astrological assessment procedures. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1976, 32, 258–265.
15.
SnyderC. R.ShenkelR. J.Effect of “favorability”, modality, relevance on acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receiving diagnostic feedback. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 44, 34–41.
16.
TysonG. A.Why people perceive horoscopes as being true: a review. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 1982, 35, 186–188.
17.
WeimanG.The prophecy that never fails: on the uses and gratifications of horoscope reading. Sociological Inquiry, 1982, 52, 274–290.
