Results of three earlier studies were reexamined for the presence of correlations between the “rhyme effect” and speech segmentation performance. No significant correlation was found.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlegriaJ.PignotE.MoraisJ.Phonetic analysis of speech and memory codes in beginning readers. Memory and Cognition, 1982, 10, 451–456.
2.
CampbellR.ButterworthB.Phonological dyslexia and dysgraphia in a highly literate subject: A developmental case with associated deficits of phonemic processing and awareness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1985, 37A, 435–476.
3.
ContentA.L'analyse phonétique explicite de la parole et l'acquisition de la lecture. L'Année Psychologique, 1984, 84, 555–572.
4.
ContentA.Le développement de l'habileté d'analyse phonétique de la parole. L'Anneé Psychologique, 1985, 85, 73–99.
5.
HallJ. W.WilsonK. P.HumphreysM. S.TinzmannM. B.BowyerP. M.Phonemic-similarity effects in good vs. poor readers. Memory and Cognition, 1983, 11, 520–527.
6.
MannV. A.Reading skill and language skill. Developmental Review, 1984, 4, 1–15.
7.
MoraisJ.BertelsonP.CaryL.AlegriaJ.Literacy training and speech segmentation. Cognition, submitted.
8.
MoraisJ.CluytensM.AlegriaJ.Segmentation abilities of dyslexies and normal readers. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1984, 58, 221–222.
9.
MoraisJ.CluytensM.AlegriaJ.ContentA.Speech-mediated retention in dyslexies. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1986, 62, 119–126.
