Perception of an Adversary as a Function of Masculinity,Sex,and Aggression/Empathy

Abstract

The study was designed to test whether men and women identifying with a masculine stereotype differ in their perception of a confederate (adversary) who displays either an empathetic or aggressive role in resolving a disagreement over social issues. It was hypothesized that masculine individuals would be more perceptually sensitive to aggressive cues of an adversary and make more hostile responses than nonmasculine individuals. Conversely, nonmasculine individuals were hypothesized to be more perceptually sensitive to empathetic cues of an adversary and make fewer hostile responses than masculine individuals. Results of both perceptual measures and the measure of hostility did not support the hypotheses. Nonmasculine individuals perceived the adversary more positively than masculine individuals regardless of strategy of resolution.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alumbaugh

R. V.

(1983, April) Sex differences and aggression: Meta-analyses of childhood, adolescent, and adult studies. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.

Baron

R. A.

(1974) Aggression as a function of victim's pain cues, level of prior anger arousal, and exposure to aggressive model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 117–124.

Baron

R. A.

(1979) Aggression, empathy, and race: Effects of victim's pain cues, victim's race, and level of instigation on physical aggression. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 103–114.

Baron

R. A.

(1983) The control of human aggression: A strategy based on incompatible responses. In Geen

R. G.

Donnerstein

E. I.

(Eds.), Aggression. Vol. 2. Theoretical and empirical reviews. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 173–190.

Eisenberg

Lennon

(1983) Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100–131.

Hoffman

M. L.

(1977) Sex differences in empathy and related behaviors. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 712–722.

Hoppe

C. M.

(1979) Interpersonal aggression as a function of subject's sex, subject's sex role identification, opponent's sex, and degree of provocation. Journal of Personality, 47, 317–329.

Schachter

Singer

J. E.

(1962) Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379–399.

Swart

Berkowitz

(1976) Effects of a stimulus associated with a victim's pain and later aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 623–631.

10.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(1983) Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row.

11.

Taylor

S. P.

Epstein

(1967) Aggression as a function of the interaction of the sex of the aggressor and sex of the victim. Journal of Personality, 35, 474–486.

12.

Zillman

(1979) Hostility and aggression. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.