This study investigated the effects of meditation/relaxation on physiological responses during the performance of a fine motor and a gross motor task. A pretest-posttest control group, randomized-blocks design was used to study a group of 16 meditators and a group of 16 nonmeditators, subgroups of each who relaxed prior to performing on a pursuit-rotor tracking device as a fine motor task and to performing the Luft cycle ergometer protocol to a heart rate of 70% of age-adjusted maximum heart rate as a gross motor task. During each of these tasks heart rate, systolic blood pressure, rate-pressure-product, and EMG activity of the frontalis muscle were monitored. No significant difference in the performance of either the fine motor or the gross motor task was noted for persons practicing meditation and persons who were nonmeditators but were given the opportunity to relax prior to a motor task. Likewise, no significant difference was noted in the pattern of response to the imposed fine motor or gross motor task by meditators or relaxed nonmeditators.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllisonJ.Respiratory changes during the practice of the technique of Transcendental Meditation. Lancet, 1970, No. 7651, 833–834.
2.
BalkeB.Correlation of static and physical endurance: I. A test of physical performance based on the cardiovascular and respiratory response to gradually increased work, 1952, Project No. 21-32-0004, Report Number 1, USAF School of Aviation Medicine, Randolf Field, Texas.
3.
CarringtonP.CollingsG.BensonH.RorinsonH.WoodL.LehrerP.WoolfolkR.ColeW.The use of meditation-relaxation techniques for the management of stress in a working population. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 1980, 22, 221–231.
4.
EasonR. G.Relation between effort, tension level, skill, and performance efficiency in a perceptual motor task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1963, 16, 297–317.
5.
EasonR. G.BranksJ.Effect of level of activation on the quality and efficiency of performance of verbal and motor skills. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1963, 16, 525–543.
6.
EasonR. G.WhiteC. T.Relationship between muscular tension and performance during pursuit. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1960, 10, 199–210.
7.
FolkowB.NeilE.Circulation. New York: Oxford Univer. Press, 1971.
8.
FreemanG. L.The spread of neuromuscular activity during mental work. Journal of General Psychology, 1931, 5, 479–494.
9.
FreemanG. L.Facilitative and inhibitory effects of muscular tension upon performance. American Journal of Psychology, 1933, 45, 16–52.
10.
FreemanG. L.The optimal muscular tensions of various performances. American Journal of Psychology, 1938, 51, 146–150.
11.
FrenchS. N.Electromyographic biofeedback for tension control during gross motor skill acquisition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1979, 47, 833–989.
12.
FrenchS. N.Electromyographic biofeedback for tension control during fine motor skill acquisition. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 1980, 5, 221–228.
13.
GolemanD.SchwartzG. E.Meditation as an intervention in stress reactivity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1976, 44, 456–466.
14.
GoodR.Frontalis muscle tension and sleep latency. Psychophysiology, 1975, 12, 465–467.
15.
GrantD. A.Analysis of variance tests in the analysis and comparison of curves. Psychological Bulletin, 1956, 53, 141–154.
16.
GreggL. W.Changes in distribution of muscular tension during psychomotor performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1942, 56, 70–77.
17.
JevningR.PirkleH. C.WilsonA. F.Behavioral alteration of plasma phenylalanine concentration. Physiology and Behavior, 1977, 19, 611–614.
18.
LazarusR. S.Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.
19.
LazarusR. S.OptonE. M.Jr.NomikosM. S.RankinN. O.The principle of short-circuiting of threat: further evidence. Journal of Personality, 1965, 33, 622–635.
20.
LuftU. C.CardusD.LimT. P. K.AndersonE. C.HowarthJ. L.Physical performance in relation to body size and composition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1963, 110, 795–808.
21.
MichaelsR. R.HuberM. J.McCannD. S.Evaluation of Transcendental Meditation as a method of reducing stress. Science, 1976, 192, 1242–1244.
22.
NidefferR. M.DicknerC. W.A case study of improved athletic performance following use of relaxation procedures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970, 30, 821–822.
23.
PatelC.Biofeedback aided relaxation and meditation in the management of hypertension. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 1977, 2, 1–41.
24.
SelyeH.The evolution of the stress concept. American Scientist, 1973, 61, 692–699.
25.
SilverB. J.GoldstoneS. E.SilverL. B.The 1990 objectives for the nation for the control of stress and violent behavior: progress report. Public Health Reports, 1984, 99, 374–384.
26.
SmithR. E.The dynamics and prevention of stress-induced burnout in athletes. Primary Care, 1984, 11, 115–127.
27.
StoyvaJ.Self-regulation and the stress related disorders: a perspective on biofeedback. In MostofskyD. (Ed.), Behavior control and modification of physiological activity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1976.
