20 behavioral attributes predicting social distance were examined among 101 junior high school students in six classrooms. The sample included 8 developmentally handicapped students, of whom at least one of each was mainstreamed into each classroom. Subjects were predominantly white, middle-class, suburban midwesterners. A sociometric nomination measure was used to obtain behavioral attribute profiles of the students which were then used to predict a psychometric measure of social distance. Handicapped students were not more socially distant than their normal peers. Factor analysis of the 20 behavioral attributes yielded four factors, three of which were significant predictors of classroom social distance, accounting for better than half the variance in social distance. These were described as Incompetent/Unassertive, Positive/Active/Assertive, and Passive/Unassertive. Social rejection in mainstreamed classrooms is more a function of perceived behavioral attributes than the label developmentally handicapped.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsherS. R., & GottmanJ. M.The development of children's friendships. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
2.
AsherS. R., & HymelS.Children's social competence in peer relations: sociometric and behavioral assessment. In WineJ. D. & SmyeM. D. (Eds.), Social competence. New York: Guilford, 1981. Pp. 125–157.
3.
BaldwinW. K.The social position of the educable mentally retarded in the regular grades in the public school. Exceptional Children, 1958, 25, 106–108.
4.
BallardM.CormanL.GottliebJ., & KaufmanM. J.Improving the social status of mainstreamed retarded children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1977, 69, 605–611.
5.
BarrA. J.GoodnightJ. H., & SallJ. P.SAS user's guide. Raleigh, NC: SAS Institute, 1979.
6.
Bureau of Publications. How to construct a sociogram. New York: Horace Mann-Lincoln Institute of School Experimentation, Teachers College, Columbia Univer., 1946.
7.
CoieJ. D., & DodgeK. A.Continuities and changes in children's social status: a five-year longitudinal study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1983, 29, 261–282.
8.
CoieJ. D.DodgeK. A., & CoppotelliH.Dimensions and types of social status. Developmental Psychology, 1982, 4, 557–570.
9.
CormanL., & GottliebJ.Mainstreaming mentally retarded children: a review of the research. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 1978, 9, 251–275.
10.
DodgeK. A.SchlundtD. C.SchockenI., & DelugachJ. D.Social competence and children's sociometric status: the role of peer group entry strategies. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1983, 29, 309–336.
11.
FordyceW.YauchW., & RathsL.A manual for the Ohio guidance tests for elementary grades. Columbus, OH: State Department of Education, 1946.
12.
GoodmanH.GottlibJ., & HarrisonR.Social acceptance of EMRs integrated into nongraded elementary school. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1972, 76, 412–417.
13.
GottliebJ., & BudoffM.Social acceptability of retarded children in nongraded schools differing in architecture. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973, 78, 15–19.
14.
GottliebJ., & DavisJ.Social acceptance of EMRs during overt behavioral interaction. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973, 78, 141–143.
15.
GreshamF. M.Social skills training with handicapped children: a review. Review of Educational Research, 1981, 51, 139–176.
16.
GreshamF. M.Situational specificity, correspondence, and social validity: a commentary on Renshaw and Asher. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1983, 29, 4, 459–465. (a)
17.
GreshamF. M.Social skills assessment as a component of mainstreaming placement decisions. Exceptional Children, 1983, 49, 331–335. (b)
18.
GuskinS.Theoretical and empirical strategies for the study of the labeling of mentally retarded persons. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 1978, 9, 127–158.
19.
HallinanM. T.Recent advances in sociometry. In AsherS. R. & GottmanJ. M. (Eds.), The development of children's friendships. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univer. Press, 1981. Pp. 91–115.
20.
JohnsonG.Social position of mentally handicapped children in regular grades. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1950, 55, 60–89.
21.
JohnsonG., & KirkS.Are mentally handicapped children segregated in the regular grades?Exceptional Children, 1950, 17, 65–68, 87–89.
22.
JordanA.Personal-social traits of mentally handicapped children. In ThurstoneT. (Ed.), An evaluation of educating mentally handicapped children in special classes in regular classes. Chapel Hill, NC: Univer. of North Carolina, 1959. Pp. 149–179.
23.
LippitR., & GoldM.Classroom social structure as a mental health problem. Journal of Social Issues, 1959, 15, 40–50.
24.
SchmuckR. A., & SchmuckP. A.Group processes in the classroom. Dubuque, IA: Brown, 1983.
25.
ShermanL. W.Social distance perceptions of elementary school children in age-heterogeneous and -homogeneous classroom settings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1984, 58, 395–409.
26.
ShermanL. W., & BurgessD. E.Behavioral attributes and social distance of developmentally handicapped and normal children. Paper presentation to the 17th Annual Gatlinburg Conference on Research in Mental Retardation/Developmental Disabilities, Gatlinburg, TN, 1984. (ERIC document ED 247 698)
27.
ShermanL. W., & WolfA.Intrapersonal perceptions of shyness and humor as related to interpersonal perceptions of social distance and humorousness. Paper presentation to the 4th International Congress on Humor, Tel Aviv, Israel, 1984. (ERIC document ED 249 459)
28.
StrauchJ.Social contact as a variable in the expressed attitudes of normal adolescents toward EMR pupils. Exceptional Children, 1970, 36, 495–499.
29.
TajfelH.Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 1982, 33, 1–39.
30.
WineJ. D., & SmyeM. D. (Eds.) Social competence. New York: Guilford, 1981.
31.
ZwickR.Nonparametric one-way multivariate analysis of variance: a computational approach based on the Pillai-Bartlett Trace. Psychological Bulletin, 1985, 97, 148–152.
