60 subjects practiced anticipating coincidence of car and ball in both the sagittal and frontal planes. Analysis of various errors indicated significant effects of plane, sex, and their interaction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BelisleJ. J.Accuracy, reliability and refractoriness in a coincidence-anticipation task. Research Quarterly, 1963, 34, 271–281.
2.
DunhamP.Jr.Age, sex, speed and practice in coincidence-anticipation performance of children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1977, 45, 187–193.
GladH. L., & DunhamP.Jr.Coincidence-anticipation performance in the sagittal and frontal planes. Paper read at the American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation Convention, Houston, 1972.
5.
GroseJ. E.Timing control and finger, arm and -whole body movements. Research Quarterly, 1976, 38, 10–21.
6.
HaywoodK. M.Eye movements during coincidence-anticipation performance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 1977, 9, 313–318.
7.
HaywoodK. M.Responses to speed changes in coincidence-anticipation judgments after extended practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1983, 54, 28–32.
8.
RidenourM. A.Influence of object size, speed, direction, height and distance on interception of a moving object. Research Quarterly, 1977, 48, 138–143.
9.
SheaC. H., & NorthamD.Discrimination of visual linear velocities. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1982, 53, 222–225.
10.
StadulisR. D.Coincidence-anticipation behavior of children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia Univer., Teachers College, 1971.
