86 college students were administered the standard Speech Sounds Perception Test and an alternate recording. Although reliability between the two recordings was moderate (r = .68) when the standard was given first, but only .36 when the alternate form was given first, differences in performance were consistent with differences in attack and decay found in voice-print tracings. Results suggest caution in using an alternate form of a neuropsychological test, particularly one using auditory stimuli, until cross-validation confirms the reliability coefficient and the level of performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CalsynD. A.O'LearyM. R., & ChaneyE. F.Shortening the Category Test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980, 48, 788–789.
2.
DeFilippisN. A.McCampbellE., & RogersP. H.Development of a booklet form of the Category Test: normative and validity. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1979, 1, 334–342.
3.
EgleL.HaagK., & MillerP. L.Psy-Dx operating manual. Joliet, IL: HEM, 1980.
4.
GoldenC. J., & AndersonS.Short form of the Speech Sounds Perception Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1977, 45, 485–486.
5.
GoldenC. J.KupermanS. K.MacInnesW. D., & MosesJ. A.Jr.Crossvalidation of an abbreviated form of the Halstead Category Test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1981, 49, 606–607.
6.
KimuraS. D.A card form of the Reitan-Modified Halstead Category Test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1981, 45, 145–146.
7.
ReitanR. M.Manual for administration of neuropsychological test batteries for adults and children. Indianapolis, IN: author, 169.
