Five methodological, conceptual, and statistical problems in a report by K. W. Jensen are listed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrannonR.Current methodological issues in paper-and-pencil measuring instruments. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 5, 618–627.
2.
GradyK. E.Sex bias in research design. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 5, 628–636.
3.
JensenK. W.Sex of the administrator as a variable affecting drawing a person. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1985, 60, 72–75.
4.
MachoverK.Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure. Springfield, IL: Thomas, 1949.
5.
OgdonP. P.Psychodiagnostics and personality assessment: a handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services, 1977.
6.
PaludiM. A.Machover revisited: impact of sex-role orientation on sex sequence on the Draw-A-Person test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1978, 47, 713–714.
7.
PaludiM. A., & BauerW. D.Impact of sex of experimenter on the Draw-A-Person test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1979, 49, 456–458.
8.
ParleeM. B.Appropriate control groups in feminist research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 5, 637–644.
9.
UngerR. K.Toward a redefinition of sex and gender, American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 1085–1094.
10.
UngerR. K.Sex as a social reality: field and laboratory research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 5, 645–653.
11.
UngerR. K.Through the looking glass: no wonderland yet! (The reciprocal relationship between methodology and models of reality.)Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1983, 8, 9–32.
12.
WallstonB. S.What are the questions in psychology of women? A feminist approach to research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1981, 5, 597–617.
