The potential role of the Archimedes spiral aftereffect, an illusory negative aftereffect of apparent movement, in the assessment of brain damage has been the subject of investigation by clinicians for over thirty years. The results beating on its utility have been highly equivocal. This paper reviews the more important studies, identifies salient issues, and suggests directions for research into brain damage using this intriguing procedure
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AaronsonB. S.Age, intelligence, aphasia and the aftereffect in an epileptic population. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1958, 14, 18–21.
2.
BarrettE. T.LogueP. E.The use of the spiral after-effect test to differentiate chronic schizophrenics from chronic organics. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1974, 30, 513–516.
3.
BergerD.EversonT.RutledgeL.KoskoffY. D.The spiral aftereffect in a neurological setting. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1958, 22, 249–255.
4.
BollT. J.The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychology Battery. In FilskovS. B.BollT. J. (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neuropsychology. New York: Wiley, 1981. Pp. 577–607.
5.
ClaridgeG. S.HerringtonR. N.An EEG correlate of the Archimedes spiral after-effect and its relationship with personality. Behavior Research and Therapy, 1963, 1, 217–229.
6.
CoonsW. H.Abstract ability in schizophrenia and the organic psychoses. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1956, 10, 43–50.
7.
DayR. H.The aftereffect of seen movement and brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1960, 24, 311–315.
8.
ElliottJ. J.III, Response bias in SAET responses of persons with organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965, 21, 647–652.
9.
FreemanE.JoseyW. E.Quantitative visual index to memory impairment. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1949, 62, 794–797.
10.
GalleshA. J.Jr.Spiral aftereffect as a test of organic brain damage. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1956, 12, 254–258.
GarrettE. S.PriceA. C.DeablerH. L.Diagnostic testing for cortical brain impairment. Archives of Neurological Psychiatry, 1957, 77, 223–225.
13.
GatesL. N.The after-effect of visually observed movement. American Journal of Psychology, 1934, 46, 34–46.
14.
GilberstadtH.ScheinJ.RosenA.Further evaluation of the Archimedes spiral aftereffect. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1958, 22, 243–248.
15.
GoldbergL. R.SmithP. A.The clinical usefulness of the Archimedes spiral in the diagnosis of organic brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1958, 22, 153–157.
16.
GoldsteinK.Modifications of behaviour consequent to cerebral lesions. Psychiatric Quarterly, 1936, 10, 586–610.
17.
GoldsteinK.The organism: A holistic approach to biology derived from pathological data in man. New York: American Book, 1939.
18.
GoldsteinK.Human nature in the light of psychopathology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univer. Press, 1940.
19.
GoldsteinK.The effect of brain damage on the personality. Psychiatry, 1952, 15, 245–260.
20.
GoldsteinK.ScheererM.Abstract and concrete behavior: An experimental study with special tests. Psychological Monographs, 1941, 53, No. 2 (Whole No. 239).
21.
GregoryR. L.Eye and brain: The psychology of seeing. London: Weiderfeld & Nicolson, 1977.
22.
HintonJ. W.CraskeB.MulliganP. E.Can we neurologise about spiral after effect duration?Personality and Individual Differences, 1981, 2, 105–107.
23.
HollandH. C.Some determinants of seen after movements in the Archimedes spiral. Acta Psychologica, 1958, 14, 215–222.
HollandH. C.BeechH. R.The spiral after-effect as a test of brain damage. Journal of Mental Science, 1958, 104, 466–471.
26.
JohnsonD. E.BauerR. W.BrownD. R.Visual afterphenomena in diagnosis. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1959, 23, 90.
27.
LodgeA.Effects of facilitating, neutral and inhibiting instructions on perceptual tasks following brain damage. Acta Psychologica, 1966, 25, 173–198.
28.
LondonP.BryanJ. H.Theory and research on the clinical use of the Archimedes spiral. Journal of General Psychology, 1960, 62, 113–125.
29.
MayerE.CoonsW. H.Motivation and the spiral aftereffect with schizophrenic and brain-damaged patients. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1960, 14, 269–274.
30.
MorantR. B.EfstathiouA.The Archimedes spiral and diagnosis of brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1966, 22, 391–397.
31.
NathansonM.BergmanP. S.GordonG. G.Denial of illness. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1952, 68, 380–387.
32.
ObrzutJ. E.ThweattR. C.Clinical differentiation with the spiral aftereffect technique. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970, 31, 995–999.
33.
OverR.Brain-damage and the spiral aftereffect: A review. Australian Journal of Psychology, 1973, 25, 251–257.
34.
PageH. A.RakitaG.KaplanH. K.SmithN. B.Another application of the spiral aftereffect in the determination of brain damage. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1957, 21, 89–91.
35.
PhilbrickE. B.The validity of the spiral aftereffect as a clinical tool for diagnosis of organic brain pathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1959, 23, 39–43.
36.
PriceA. C.DeablerH. L.Diagnosis of organicity by means of spiral aftereffect. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1955, 19, 291–302.
37.
ReillyT.Some normative data for the spiral aftereffect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970, 31, 211–217.
38.
RussellE. W.NeuringerC.GoldsteinG.Assessment of brain damage: A neuropsychological key approach. New York: Wiley, 1970.
39.
SmithA.Ambiguities in concepts and studies of “brain damage” and “organicity”. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 1962, 135, 311–326.
40.
SpivackG.LevineM.The spiral aftereffect and reversible figures as measures of brain damage and memory. Journal of Personality, 1957, 25, 767–778.
41.
StagerP.BurtonA. C.Graphic recording of the spiral aftereffect: A study of its magnitude and rate of decay. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1964, 18, 118–125.
42.
StandleeL. S.The Archimedes negative aftereffect as an indication of memory impairment. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1953, 17, 317.
43.
StormsL. H.Relationships among patients' emotional problems, neurologists' judgments, and psychological tests of brain dysfunction. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1972, 28, 54–60.
44.
WeinsteinE. A.KahnR. L.The syndrome of anosognosia. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1950, 64, 772–791.
45.
WeinsteinE. A.KahnR. L.Personality factors in denial of illness. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1953, 69, 335–367.
46.
WohlgemuthA.On the aftereffect of seen movement. British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplement, 1911, 1, 1–117.
