A pilot study and an experiment on the design of questionnaires was implemented in two surveys. In the first pilot study (n = 856) layout and page-size were varied; in the experiment (n = 1360) only the page-size differed. Professional design of the questionnaire had no significant positive effect on the response rates. In the experiment questionnaires of the size 17 × 24 cm had significant higher response rates than the smaller one (14.5 × 21 cm). Questionnaires judged to be salient to or relevant to respondents' interests had a higher response rate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmzandG. D.Suicidepoging en suicidale ideatie. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Leyden, 1983.
2.
ChildersT. L.FerrellO. C.Response rates and perceived questionnaire length in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 1979, 16, 429–431.
3.
DillmanD. A.Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1978.
4.
HeberleinT. A.BaumgartnerR.Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: A quantitative analysis of the published literature. American Sociological Review, 1978, 43, 447–462.
5.
JobberD.SandersonS.The effects of a prior letter and coloured questionnaire paper on mail survey response rates. Journal of the Market Research Society, 1983, 25, 339–349.
6.
NederhofA. J.The effects of material incentives in mail surveys: Two studies. Population Opinion Quarterly, 1983, 47, 103–111. (a)
7.
NederhofA. J.Effects of repetition and consistency of personalization treatments on response rate in mail surveys. Social Science Research, 1983, 12, 1–9. (b)
8.
PietersR.Huisvuilscheiding met de duobak. Report, Werkgroep E&M, University of Leyden, 1983.
9.
RoscoeA. M.LangD.ShethJ. N.Follow-up methods, questionnaire length and market differences in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing, 1975, 39, 20–27.
10.
YuJ.CooperH.A quantitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires. Journal of Marketing Research, 1983, 20, 36.44.
