In this study the sign-based perceptual abilities of 59 deaf children are investigated. Like many hearing speaking children, deaf signing children appear to perceive isolated lexical items based on the formational parameters of those items. Also, deaf signers show trends similar to those exhibited by hearing speakers for the development of the perceptual ability necessary to distinguish between minimal pairs within their respective language systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartonD.Phonemic perception in children. In Yeni-KomshianG. H.KavanaughJ. F.FergusonC. A. (Eds.), Child phonology: perception. Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press, 1980. Pp. 97–114.
2.
BellugiU., & SipleP.Remembering with and without words. In BressonF. (Ed.), Current problems in psycholinguistics. Paris: CNRS, 1974. Pp. 215–236.
3.
EilersR. E., & OllerD. K.The role of speech discrimination in developmental sound substitutions. Papers and reports on Child Language, Stanford University, 1975, 10, 215–226.
4.
GrahamL. W., & HoushA. S.Phonological oppositions in children: a perceptual study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1971, 49, 559–566.
5.
HamiltonH.Cheremic perception by deaf children. Sign Language Studies, 1984, 42, 23–30.
6.
HamiltonH.Linguistic encoding in short-term memory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State Univer., 1984.
7.
JuleszB., & HirschI. J.Visual and auditory perception: an essay of comparison. In DavidE. E. & DenesP. B. (Eds.), Human communication: a unified view. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972. Pp. 233–240.
8.
KoeigsknechtR. A., & LeeL. L.Distinctive feature analysis of speech-sound discrimination in children. Paper presented at the American Speech and Hearing Association, 1968.
9.
LiljencrantsJ., & LindblomB.Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: the role of perceptual contrasts. Language, 1972, 48, 839–862.
10.
MiyawakiK.StrangeW.VerbuggeR.LibermanA. M.JenkinsJ. J., & FujimuraO.An effect of linguistic experience: the discrimination of [r] and [1] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception and Psychophysics, 1975, 18, 331–340.
11.
NewkirkD.KlimaE. S.PedersonC., & BellugiU.Linguistic evidence from slips of the hand. In FromkinV. A. (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press, 1980. Pp. 165–197.
12.
PoiznerH.BellugiU., & TweneyR.Processing of formational, semantic, and iconic information of signs in American Sign Language. Working paper, The Salk Institute, 1979.
13.
PronovostW., & DumbletonC.A picture-type speech-discrimination test. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disabilities, 1953, 18, 158–266.
14.
ShandM.Sign based short-term coding of American Sign Language signs and printed English words by congenitally deaf signers. Cognition Psychology, 1982, 14, 1–12.
15.
SnyderR. T., & PopeP.New norms for and an items analysis for the Wepman test at first grade, 6-year level. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1970, 31, 1007–1010.
16.
StokoeW.CasterlineD., & CronebergC.Dictionary of American Sign Language. Washington, D. C.: Gallaudet College Press, 1965. (Rev. ed., Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press, 1976)
17.
TemplinM. C.Certain language skills in children. Minneapolis, MN: Univer. of Minnesota Press, 1957.
18.
TikofskyR. S., & McInishJ. R.Consonant discriminations by seven year olds. Psychonomic Science, 1968, 10, 61–62.
19.
TrehubS. E.The discrimination of foreign speech contrasts by infants and adults. Child Development, 1976, 47, 466–472.
20.
WepmanJ.Auditory Discrimination Test. Chicago, IL: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1958.
