Several previous studies, using letter sequences of varying approximation to real text, have shown that reading skill is closely related to the use of orthographic redundancy. The present experiment extended this by examining the use of redundancy at the word level. 10 adults were more sensitive than grade-six children to inter-word constraints but both good and poor grade-six readers (ns = 10) appeared equally sensitive to redundancy at the word level.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CattellR. B., & CattbllA. K. S.Handbook for the Culture-Fair Intelligence Test. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality & Ability Testing, 1960.
2.
DanemanM., & CarpenterP. A.Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980, 19, 450–466.
3.
FraserD. B.Selective attention in good and poor readers. Unpublished Master's thesis, Queen's Univer., 1979.
4.
GatesA. I., & MacGinitieW. H.Technical manual for the Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. New York: Teacher's College Press, Columbia Univer., 1965.
5.
HirataK., & BrydenM. P.Tables of letter sequences varying in order of approximation to English. Psychonomic Science, 1971, 25, 322–324.
6.
HoffmanJ.Experimentell-psychologische Untersuchungen über Leseleistungen von Schulkindern. Archiv für die Gesamte Psychologie, 1927, 58, 325–388.
7.
LeftonL. A., & SpraginsA. B.Orthographic structure and reading experience affect the transfer from iconic to short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974, 103, 775–781.
8.
LeftonL. A.SpraginsA. B., & ByrnesJ.English orthography: Relation to reading experience. Bulletin of the Psychonomics Society, 1973, 2, 281–283.
9.
MasonM.Reading ability and letter search time: Effects of orthographic structure defined by single-letter positional frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1975, 104, 146–166.
10.
MasonM.From print to sound in mature readers as a function of reader ability and two forms of orthographic regularity. Memory & Cognition, 1978, 6, 568–581.
11.
MasonM.Reading ability and the encoding of item and location information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980, 6, 89–98.
12.
MasonM., & KatzL.Visual processing of nonlinguistic strings: Redundancy effects and reading ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1976, 105, 338–348.
13.
MassaroD., & TaylorG. A.Reading ability and utilization of orthographic structure in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980, 72, 730–742.
14.
MewhortD. J. K., & CampbellA. J.Toward a model of skilled reading: An analysis of performance in tachistoscopic tasks. In MacKinnonE. & WalletT. G. (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press, 1981. Pp. 39–118.
15.
MillerG. A., & SelfridgeJ. A.Verbal context and the recall of meaningful material. American Journal of Psychology, 1950, 76, 76–85.
16.
PerfettiC. A., & LesgoldA. M.Discourse comprehension and sources of individual differences. In JustM. & CarpenterP. A. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978. Pp. 141–183.
17.
Scheerer-NeumannG.The utilization of inter-word structure in poor readers: Experimental evidence and a training program. Psychological Research, 1981, 43, 155–178.
