A reanalysis of Tringo's (1970) hierarchy of preference toward disabled groups was conducted through multidimensional scaling. The structure underlying social-distance preferences is multidimensional in nature rather than unidimensional as presented by Tringo. The retained 3-dimensional solution was interpreted as focusing on the visibility of the disabilities, the organic versus functional nature of the disabilities, and an element of ostracism.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbromsK. I.KoderaT. L.Acceptance hierarchy of handicaps: Validation of Kirk's statement, “Special education often begins where medicine stops.”Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979, 12, 15–20.
2.
AntonekR. F.A hierarchy of attitudes toward exceptionality. Journal of Special Education, 1980, 14, 231–241.
3.
BarkerD. G.Concepts of disabilities. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1964, 43, 371–374.
4.
BarkerR. G.WrightB. A.MeyersonL.GonickM. R.. Adjustment to physical handicaps and illness: A survey of the social psychology of physique and disability. New York: Social Science Research Council, 1953. (Bulletin 55).
5.
BoweF.Handicapping America: Barriers to disabled people. New York: Harper & Row, 1978.
6.
GrandS. A.BernierJ. E.StrohmerD. C.Attitudes toward disabled persons as a function of social context and specific disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 1982, 27, 165–174.
7.
GuskinS.Dimensions of judged similarity among deviant types. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1963, 68, 218–224. (a).
8.
GuskinS.Social psychologies of mental deficiency. In EllisN. R. (Ed.), Handbook of mental deficiency: Psychological theory and research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963. Pp. 325–352. (b).
9.
HarasymiwS. J.HorneM. D.Teacher attitudes toward handicapped children and regular class integration. Journal of Special Education, 1976, 10, 393–400.
10.
JonesR. L.The hierarchical structure of attitudes toward the exceptional. Exceptional Children, 1974, 40, 430–435.
11.
JonesR. L.GottfriedN. W.OwensA.The social distance of the exceptional: A study at the high school level. Exceptional Children, 1966, 32, 551–556.
12.
KruskalJ. B.WishM. Multidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1978.
13.
PandaK. C.BartelN. R.Teacher perception of exceptional children. Journal of Special Education, 1972, 6, 261–266.
14.
SchiffmanS. S.ReynoldsM. L.YoungF. W.Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods, ad applications. New York: Academic Press, 1981.
15.
SchmelkinL. P.Perceptions of disabilities: A multidimensional scaling approach. Journal of Special Education, 1982, 16, 161–177.
16.
SchmelkinL. P.A multidimensional scaling of disability labels. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, April, 1983.
