For 137 women and 115 men first-year college students tested spatial visualization and mechanical reasoning were most strongly correlated with four everyday spatial abilities—understanding mathematics/science and graphs/charts, drafting and drawing things, and arranging objects. Despite greater practice on only 2 of 10 activities, men uniformly judged they had significantly better spatial ability compared to their same-gender peers than did the women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HarrisL. J.Sex-related variations in spatial skill. In LibenL. S.PattersonA. H.NewcombeN. (Eds.), Spatial representation and behavior across the life span: Theory and application. New York: Academic Press, 1981. Pp. 83–125.
2.
LunneborgP. W.Sex differences in self-assessed, everyday spatial abilities: Differential practice or self-esteem?Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1984, 58, 213–214.
3.
McGeeM. G.Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 1979, 86, 889–918.
4.
NewcombeN.Sex-related differences in spatial ability: Problems and gaps in current approaches. In PotegalM. (Ed.), Spatial abilities: Development and physiological foundations. New York: Academic Press, 1982. Pp. 223–250.
5.
NewcombeN.BanduraM. M.TaylorD. G.Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles, 1983, 9, 377–386.
6.
NieN. H.HullC. H.JenkinsJ. G.SteinbrennerK.BentD. H.SPSS: Statistical package for the social sciences. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.
7.
NoethR. J.Counselor's guide. Seattle, WA: Washington Pre-college Program, 1979.
8.
ShermanJ. A.Problem of sex differences in space perception and aspects of intellectual functioning. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 290–299.
9.
Washington Pre-college Program. Registration booklet. Seattle, WA: University of Washington, 1983.
