The direction rather than the magnitude of the Zoellner illusion was assessed for intersect angles greater than 40°. Data support the illusion's description as an instance of the principle of acute angle enlargement.
GibsonJ. J.Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines: II. Simultaneous contrast and the areal restriction of the after-effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1937, 20, 553–569.
3.
GibsonJ. J.RadnerM.Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines: I. Quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1937. 20, 453–467.
4.
HofmanF. B.BielchowskyA.Über die Einstellung der scheinbaren Horizantalen und Vertikalen bei Betrachtung eines von Schräegen Konturen erfüllen Gesichtsfeldes. Pflüger's Archiv für die gesante Physiologie des Menschen und für Tiere, 1909, 126, 453–475.
5.
MaheuxM.TownsendJ. C.GresockC. J.Geometric factors in illusions of direction. American Journal of Psychology, 1960, 73, 535–543.
6.
MorinagaS.Untersuchungen über die Zollnersche Tauschung. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 1933, 8, 195–242. (German Summary 23–25).
7.
RobinsonJ. O.The psychology of visual illusion. London: Hutchinson, 1972.
8.
WallaceG. K.The effect of contrast on the Zoellner illusion. Vision Research, 1975, 15, 963–966.
9.
WenderothP.ParkinsonA.WhiteD.A comparison of visual tilt illusions measured by the techniques of vertical setting, parallel matching, and dot alignment. Perception, 1979, 8, 47–57.
10.
WolfeJ. M.HeldR.Gravity and the tilt aftereffect. Vision Research, 1982, 22, 1075–1078.
