Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examined the reliability and validity of graphology as an assessment tool in selecting candidates for an infantry officers' training course. Six professional graphologists' predictions were compared with those of 6 psychologists and 6 laymen who evaluated the same 65 handwriting specimens on 13 scales. Coefficients of concordance in the graphologists' group were relatively low and ranged from .20 to .37 but were higher than those of psychologists (.17 to .36) and laymen (.09 to .20). The median validity coefficients of graphologists in predicting success in the course ranged from .11 to .26, while the validities of psychologists were from .07 to .23 and of laymen from —.05 to .17. The median validities of a General Evaluation Scale were .26, .20, and .11 for graphologists, psychologists, and laymen, respectively. The possible uses of graphology in selection and direction of research were discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Birge

W. R.

An experimental enquiry into the measurable handwriting correlates of five personality traits. Journal of Personality, 1954, 23, 215–223.

Cantril

Rand

H. A.

An additional study of the determination of personal interests by psychological and graphological methods. Character and Personality, 1934, 3, 72–78.

Crider

The reliability and validity of two graphologists. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1941, 25, 323–325.

Crumbaugh

J. C.

Stockholm

Validation of graphoanalysis by ‘global’ or ‘holistic’ methods. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1977, 44, 403–410.

Currer-Briggs

Handwriting analysis in business: The use of graphology in personnel selection. New York: Wiley, 1971.

Frederick

C. J.

Some phenomena affecting handwriting analysis, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965, 20, 211–218.

Galbraith

Wilson

Reliability of the graphoanalytic approach to handwriting analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1964, 19, 615–618.

Jansen

Validation of graphological judgments: An experimental study. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton, 1973.

Lemke

L. A.

Kirchner

J. H.

A multivariate study of handwriting, intelligence, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1971, 35, 584–592.

10.

Lester

McLaughlin

Nosal

Graphological signs for extraversion. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1977, 44, 137–138.

11.

Linton

Epstein

Hartford

Personality and perceptual correlates of primary beginning strokes in handwriting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1962, 15, 159–170.

12.

Lomonoco

Harrison

Accuracy of matching TAT and graphological personality profiles. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1973, 36, 703–706.

13.

McNeil

E. B.

Blum

G. S.

Handwriting and psycho-sexual dimensions of personality. Journal of Projective Techniques, 1952, 16, 476–484.

14.

Rafaeli

Klimoski

Predicting sales success through handwriting analysis: An evaluation of the effects of training and handwriting sample content. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1983, 68, 212–217.

15.

Roman

K. G.

Handwriting: A key to personality. New York: Pantheon, 1952.

16.

Rosenthal

D. A.

Lines

Handwriting as a correlate of extraversion. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1978, 42, 45–48.

17.

Siegel

Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.

18.

Sonnemann

Kerman

J. P.

Handwriting analysis—a valid selection tool. Personnel, 1962, 39, 8–14.

19.

Vestewig

R. E.

Santee

A. A.

Moss

M. K.

Validity and student acceptance of a graphoanalytic approach to personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1976, 40, 592–597.

20.

Williams

Berg-Croso

Handwriting characteristics and their relationship to Eysenck's Extraversion-Introversion and Kagan's Impulsivity-Reflectivity dimensions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1977, 41, 291–298.

21.

Zdep

S. M.

Weaver

H. B.

The graphoanalytic approach to selecting life insurance salesmen. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1967, 51, 295–299.

Reliability and Validity of Graphological Assessment in the Selection Process of Military Officers

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References